Some people think that environmental problem should be solved on global scale while other think it is better to eat with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of environmental issues has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question, is it responsibility of individual nation or a whole globe to keep environment healthy? where it is held view that every single person contribution is essential, however many hold its opposite view. In this essay both sides of the argument will be examined with related reasons and example.
From social standpoint, role of a nation can give a noticeable effect in the society which are rooted in the fact that sole contribution set a counterpart to global level which are inextricably bound up. According to my experience when I was a university student I performed an academic experiment which discovered pollutions, industrial harmful gas emission and many more can be treated if proper guidance or strict rules to offer to an personal level from government organisation. This beneficial ramification of individual impact to solve environmental issues are seen.
Within the realm of global arena, the problems are taking place from smaller to higher scale which cannot only be treated by internationally. Smaller issues such as smoking cigarettes, Use of automobiles to bigger one such as deforestation, industrialisation etc are playing pivotal role in destroying environment, which is showing individual contribution in environment leading into international issue. Moreover fundamental aspects of global issues can give an overall graph, which undoubtably leads to miss guidance as every problem vary from nation to nation. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of international solution correlate negatively. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of environmental statistics.
To conclude there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of nations contribution far outweighs global. Not only the advantage of sole person contribution leads to international solution but also pinpoint to create healthy environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Where
...hole globe to keep environment healthy? where it is held view that every single perso...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...rson contribution is essential, however many hold its opposite view. In this essay both s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...er guidance or strict rules to offer to an personal level from government organisa...
^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...nment leading into international issue. Moreover fundamental aspects of global issues ca...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69426751592 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36375089355 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617834394904 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1494434796 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.538461538 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15500460048 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577417161511 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402651016426 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929852311194 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217103921012 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.