Some people think that having a set retirement age (e.g. 65 years) for everybody, regardless of occupation, is unfair. They believe that certain workers deserve to retire and receive a pension at an earlier age.Do you agree or disagree?Which types of work

The countries around the globe normally have a retirement age of 65 years for occupations that fall under their regime. A group of people thinks that setting the age of 65 to take retirement cannot be justified and it should be set up as per the occupation of the workers. This essay will discuss this view as per my understanding and will produce a conclusion in the end.
Firstly, setting up a retirement age is crucial for many jobs such as government teachers and other government duties as people get used to their jobs and wouldn’t give it up until the time of their death. If no retirement age is set up for these jobs, it will increase unemployment among the youths and will also hamper the quality of the work. Hence, it becomes significant to set up the retirement age for the jobs.
Secondly, there are various jobs such as duty in the armed forces and other blue-collar jobs which require heavy physical capacity and also have detrimental effects on the workers’ physical as well as mental health in the long run. Furthermore, as these jobs are also extremely important and require youths with enthusiasm and without any health issues, governments should ensure to facilitate early or voluntary retirement along with proper pension and healthcare benefits.
Lastly, not all occupations can be put in the same basket. Therefore, it becomes very important to have different sets of policies according to their requirements.
In essence, as per my opinion, on the one hand, job such as teaching and other white-collar jobs don’t require any physical efforts but expertise; people should be allowed to work in these sectors till the age of 65. While on the other hand, for jobs such as armed forces and other blue-collar jobs that require physical abilities more than mental ones, workers should be allowed to take early retirement with all the benefits. They should also be allowed to take voluntary retirement if needed.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, such as, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9512195122 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76406548424 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487804878049 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.2256892071 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.923076923 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4615384615 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221487200354 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959675994619 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699251848768 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124854417316 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712567221492 0.056905535591 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.