task 2 writing general, topic electronic gadgets influence on people
There is no doubt that electronic gadgets have changed significantly the ways in which humankind deals with almost everything. In addition, The world becomes better plant because of this technological breakthrough and the computers using. Definitely, I wholeheartedly agree with this notion and in the following lines, my idea will be clarified and supported with examples.
First, a pivotal influence of the using of this equipment is the personal's communication. This is because, not only do these devices might help people to interact with each other, but also it changes the globe to be one small village. To illustrate, according to a recent research paper which was published by British Colombia University, more than two-fifths from the citizens in the developed countries prefer to talk and socialize with their friends and families via laptops. Hence, this contemporary equipment has an extremely positive effect on individuals in their social aspects.
Second, computers become a principle contributor in the way of students' education. Although in the previous decades, the young adults could attend their schools class and spent ages to search for a single piece of information, in the meanwhile they use their electronic gadgets to reach almost all the cutting edge knowledge via the online pages. For instance, as per the Japanese statistical authority's newsletter, while youngsters depend on the world wide webs, their educational level were enhanced dramatically. Consequently, it can predicted in the near future, e-learning will be widespread due to the above influence of the computer’s dependency.
After manifesting the above ideas, it can be concluded, despite the fact of there are some drawbacks for citizens using of these piece of equipment such as leak of face to face interaction, there are various positive points from its using, such as the virtual communication and distance learning. Moreover, I highly recommended that the authorities should conduct awareness campaigns to shed more light on these privileges.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'personals'' or 'personal's'?
Suggestion: personals'; personal's
...e of the using of this equipment is the personals communication. This is because, not onl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...sletter, while youngsters depend on the world wide webs, their educational level were enha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...sletter, while youngsters depend on the world wide webs, their educational level were enha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'predict'
Suggestion: predict
...nced dramatically. Consequently, it can predicted in the near future, e-learning will be ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to shed more light on these privileges.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, while, for instance, in addition, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51265822785 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07021395798 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648734177215 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5017954494 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0749960814379 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254101243113 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349959839966 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0407852280675 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249170453784 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.