Theoretical subjects such as mathematics and philosophy are taught in universities but students prefer more practical subjects such as accounting and computer programming. Some people believe theoretical subjects should be abandoned in universities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, young generations who are dynamic tend to select practical majors like software engineering rather than theoretical fields such as philosophy in universities. Therefore, there is a fair amount of people believes that universities should remove theoretical subjects in their curriculums. I totally with this argument, so this essay will argue why theory subjects should be banned.
On the one hand, there is a reason that schools have to keep teaching theoretical subjects. The theory is an essential base for studying further subjects including practical ones. For instance, to enroll computer-programming course, students need to pass mathematics first because they will learn algorithms, which relates directly to mathematics. This example has been supported the idea that teaching theoretical subjects in universities is necessary.
Although the theory is necessary, however, I am still in favor of the idea that educational organizations should remove heavy theoretical contents from the curriculums. The first reason is that the theory is not only very boring but it is also extremely complex. Once students are not interested in a complex subject, they will hardly understand and acquire knowledge from the subject. The second reason is that labor market in current technology era needs people who have practical skills and are ready to work immediately. Regarding the current study of London University, about 90% of employers surveyed want to hire students who already had hands-on experiences instead of they have to give them more training. Due to the facts above, universities should teach rather practical trainings than theoretical subjects.
This essay argued why theoretical contents should be removed from universities. In my opinion, I completely agree with this argument because the labor market needs and the theoretical subjects are useless if students cannot understand the content.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, still, therefore, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66089965398 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06142149611 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584775086505 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7655327562 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.066666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361619339708 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117138063698 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780703645584 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226567382954 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590654879469 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.