World history suggests that violence and conflict were more evident under male leadership than under female leadership.So, for peace to prevail, female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership. To what extent do you agree or di

Every country has some issues even though it is well developed, and world history consist all the chapters ended with brutality. However, There are many incidents happened in the past which showed that women leadership were more peaceful compared with men, So the question has been raised that is women leadership are far better than men. As far my am concerned I am strongly disagree this fallacy that women command is good.

Firstly, World history is full of war , crime and violence, and most of the countries are dominated by men, so that it gave an impression that male are rude and their policies are merciless. For an Instance, World had seen World war-1 and World war-2, and the reason behind these war were target men leadership only. This past experiences move us to think about alternative leadership.

On the other hand, History had many blunders which were made by women leadership, and still these wounds are yet not healed. For an Instance, Indian Prime Minister, Mrs. Indira Gandhi conducted a military operation on one of the holiest place. Operation name was give Operation Blue Star, and this action killed many innocent citizens. Till date, Sikh people did not forget that brutal act. Hence, The idea to give the responsibilites to the women to lead a country or a system does not bring peace and harmony.

So to conclude, As I mentioned change in leadership gender does not solve the equation of hate, violence or crime. History teach us lesson that to eliminate all the issues honest leaders are need, change the gender type will not outcome the desire results.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...men leadership are far better than men. As far my am concerned I am strongly disag...
^^
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...n. As far my am concerned I am strongly disagree this fallacy that women command is good...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Firstly, World history is full of war , crime and violence, and most of the cou...
^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
... war-2, and the reason behind these war were target men leadership only. This past e...
^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...r were target men leadership only. This past experiences move us to think about alternative lead...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, so, still, well, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8962962963 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44158897756 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622222222222 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9292379423 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4285714286 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225796105126 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643937648668 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679171733549 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126140890279 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447202010815 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.