Peace is one of the main objectives every society and nation wants. Referring to the past events of violence and conflicts, female leadership is being considered as a better option than the male leadership, which I believe is incorrect to judge on the basis of gender.
Natural evolution has to layer a distinctive role in the personalities of the sexes. From ancient times, the habits and deeds they have done has inculcated such traits in them. For example, men tend to do all the physical activities and hard work in the ancient era, which results in the practicality traits in them. They were habitual of analysing the possible outcomes of any action in advance to conclude a decision with least possibility of failure. In the medieval and contemporary times, male leaders took steps which were more practical and beneficial for masses, which is a good thing. But other men will also want to gain the same or even better status of living. Because, men want the desired things by hook or by crook, a part of natural selection, they mostly attack on others to gain their status and wealth as same as our male ancestors used to gain something in the past.
On the other side, women tend to be more emotional and conservative in the ancient times, and such qualities can also be seen in the modern era as well. They always try to do things more gently and politely, so that others cannot get affected, which is a plus point for them. But, being more emotional and less exposed to external environment, they are more prone to be conned by others, which can be harmful for a society.
To conclude, I believe that both men and women have certain qualities which lead then to be seen a potential leader for maintaining peace. But, using previous incidents as a base, we cannot outcast men from leadership. I think, in order to appoint a leader for maintaining peace, one should be judged on the qualities what he/she possesses, not on the basis of gender.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...ction in advance to conclude a decision with least possibility of failure. In the medieval...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, well, as to, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70058139535 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57591439655 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7476013948 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217724900771 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674966229279 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907347587212 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152972424167 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108330469228 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.