It is clearly understood that humans always have a desire to see a new place and travel to another place. Some people believe the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour leader. Whereas others hold exactly the opposite perspective. As far as I am concerned, traveling with a group can be very funny, and also can be very safe. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that when people travel with a group that know many places, and is familiar with the environment, travel can be very safe, and easy. For example, I and my friends decided to go to the desert and see the sky of that place at night. We made a plan for that trip and decided to go there with a tour, and with a group led, but the cost of the trip became expensive and some of us decided to go there by themselves, and they say to us is not dangerous and we could manage the situation, I tried to change their mind, but they do not listen to me, so we separated and go there separately. At that place, we were so comfortable with other members of the group and heard some stories about the desert, and it was an amazing experiment, but during the travel, we never met our friends, and we thought there are came back. When we came back from the trip we realizes that our friends missing in the desert, and it was terrible news, after a week the police and locals fund them, while they were in a bad position, so after that, I decided to go to the trip only with a group led.
Another reason which should be taken into consideration is that when people go to travel in a group they can spend so much fun with them, also they can get familiar with the culture of that city or region, and get excellent information from locals of there. In the previous example, when I and my friend travel with a group, we got information from the tour leader, he spoke about the history of that place and explained some local ceremonies that I never read about that in the history books, also after the trip when we decided to manage our cast, and financial stuff, we realize we were wrong about the cast, and with the group, we spending low money, and that was awesome.
To put it briefly, if one weighs the merits and demerits of the aforementioned statement, one soon realizes that for traveling safe, and comfortable it is very necessary for everyone to join the group, especially in a dangerous place of being with a tour guide can reduce many of that danger. In fact, there is a myriad of other reasons supporting the above statement, which could be mentioned but are not embraced due to the dearth of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...vel is in a group led by a tour leader. Whereas others hold exactly the opposite perspe...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 847, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...t our friends, and we thought there are came back. When we came back from the trip w...
^^^^
Line 2, column 893, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'realize'
Suggestion: realize
...ack. When we came back from the trip we realizes that our friends missing in the desert,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, if, so, whereas, while, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 13.8261648746 217% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.33601609658 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39753607192 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434607645875 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 16.0 1.86738351254 857% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.1344086022 174% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.105144553 48.9658058833 225% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 153.928571429 100.406767564 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.5 20.6045352989 172% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191060840251 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771717953323 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666539812061 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133764113352 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226421336075 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 58.1214874552 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.0537634409 159% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.