Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Companies should pay for employees to get university degree.
In the modern-day, occupation plays a prominent role in all societies. Owing to it is of paramount importance, a large number of scientists have been always searching for ways to promote their companies. A controversial question which deserves some words here is whether or not companies and firms ought to allocate some parts of the budget for sending their workers to university has provoked among psychologists. I assert that studying at the university brings several merits for companies. In what follows, the most clear-cut reasons will be discussed.
To commence with, one of the most significant proofs of this claim is that order to participate at the university causes the information to become up-to-date. To shed more light on this matter, in the modern era, most companies are competing for becoming flourishing in the country. Therefore, it is important that employees have up-to-date information, and also become familiar with sundry topics. In this situation, if a manager of companies allocates some parts of their budget to the employees do to university and achieve a degree; indeed, assist them to become more prosperous in their performances. Because they earn sufficient knowledge and information about their careers, they become skilful members. For example, consider a huge company with numerous engineers, workers, employees, and many other similar items. In this situation, if the manager of this company allocates some money to the education of the company’s members, he can, in fact, guarantee the prosperity of his company. As a result, their educated employees can better deal with new and novel methods more readily. Thus,
the more members of a factory become educated, the more they can become successful in their business.
The second and equally exquisite point of this assertion is that universities can solve most company’s problems fundamentally. To elaborate on this point, some of the firm’s problems are solved by educated people. Hence, when companies allocate some parts of the budget, they will increase the connection between the company and the university. Therefore, some favourable options will become appeared for factories since they can provide suitable conditions for academic persons to accomplish some investigations, and then they utilize their outcomes. For instance, consider a factory whose goal is to produce ready concrete. In this situation, because of the link between the university and factory, professors can fulfil their research about finding a new type of concrete in their factory and then the administrators of that company can utilize their results, which can be very lucrative for them. Consequently, not only does spending money on employees’ education brings positive effects for themselves, but also, they can achieve to modern ways more quickly.
All in all, considering the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that companies must spend money for sending their employees to the university. I believe that does the information of workers become up-to-date but also most company’s problems can fundamentally solve.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...Owing to it is of paramount importance, a large number of scientists have been always searching f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...stion which deserves some words here is whether or not companies and firms ought to allocate s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'participating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'order' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: participating
...cant proofs of this claim is that order to participate at the university causes the informatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...amentally. To elaborate on this point, some of the firm’s problems are solved by educated ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2649.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49585062241 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99636565842 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50622406639 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 828.9 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9285535056 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.173913043 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9565217391 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167107162305 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569520295923 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036519458343 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942988933737 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536842028848 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.