Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to choose friends that can have fun with you than to choose friends that will help you when you need them.
Without a shadow of doubt, every individual’s friendship’s circular plays a pivotal role in many aspects of their life. In this regard, some people are inclined toward this opinion that having friends that a person could have fun with them is more important than who will help the person in need whereas others hold exactly the opposite perspective. As far as I am concerned, the latter’s advantages carry more weight. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two noticeable reasons.
First, one should take into account the fact that having friends, which help a person in need, may cause him to make some improvements. It is widely accepted that everybody has different skills and abilities, which can be completely different from others. Also, they can transfer their knowledge and information to each other. Therefore, being helpful friends around a person will enhance the chance of transferring and sharing their skills. As a result, the person’s skills and knowledge will be elevated thanks to his friends. To shed light on this issue, when I was a master student, my professor asked me and some other students including one of my friends to form a group and work on a specific project. After analyzing and allocating everybody’s task, I found that I needed to be familiar with mathematical software for doing my task. Since I had not had any experience with that software, my friend taught me how I should use it and also, provided me some excellent materials in order to become more familiar with it. Consequently, I could have done my task completely. This sample obviously shows that having helpful friends can improve a person’s abilities.
Another equally noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that some problems are difficult for a person to propose with their family. It is crystal clear that every individual faces some difficulties in their life and consequently, they are convenient to share with their friends. Hence, in this situation having a trustable and helpful friend is of paramount importance. As an example to illustrate this matter, one of my friends’ father was so strict about her scores. Unfortunately, he could not have studied for one of her exams and so, he failed. Since he had to pay some money in order to take the course again in the next semester, he was worried and asked one of his friends to help him. As a result, by borrowing money, he could have taken the course. Had he not had that friend he would have forced to ask his father. It may have had some negative effects on his relationship with his father.
To wrap it up all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that although everybody can enjoy having friends that can have fun with them, it is crucial for everybody to select friends who help him in need. In this way, by helping each other they can both benefit and strengthen their relationship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'making'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: making
... which help a person in need, may cause to make some improvements for him. It is widely...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, whereas, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 75.0 43.0788530466 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2447.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94343434343 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90114374639 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 755.1 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4273367748 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.88 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219058173716 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650591656668 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551474900242 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160334372384 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355230144103 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.