Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
According to the improvement of today's lifestyle, most people believe that governments have to boost internet access. However, others feel that they need a superior public transportation system more than in the past. Though both groups have convincing reasons for their views, we should consider crucial issues. From my personal angle, improving public transportation is more important. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explain in the following paragraphs.
First of all, by progressing public transportation, we can prevent wasting time. Today most people go to work, university or school, so they need vehicles to transport them more than in the past, according to big cities and transportation between countrysides and cities. Obviously, public transportation can play a key role in our life. If public transportation progress, it can cause to decrease in arrival time since it can diminish traffic. This is because efficient public transportation can encourage people to use it instead of their personal car, which causes more traffics. Furthermore, by increasing public vehicles people do not need to spend most of their time waiting in stations.
Secondly, if public transportation improves, it can prohibit to make more pollution. Since countries expanded, they started to contaminate their environment with factories and cars. Needless to say, governments can not stop factories because they supply people's demands. But they can help to decrease using cars, by improving public transportation. Cars can emit Methan and Dioxidcarbon, which can demolish the quality of air that we breathe. Subsequently, it can cause some diseases and hurt our lungs. So, efficient public transportation can extol people to use it instead of their own cars, which emit harmful combinations. Consequently, this can be a beneficial solution to reduce air pollution.
In conclusion, public transportation is a principal issue which should be noticed. By improving public transportation, people may not spend most of their time in traffic. In addition, it can be one way for the government to control contamination since it can decrease the number of personal cars, which release harmful gases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: decreasing
...c transportation progress, it can cause to decrease in arrival time since it can diminish t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'people'
Suggestion: people
... not stop factories because they supply peoples demands. But they can help to decrease ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onal cars, which release harmful gases.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47214076246 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19727451205 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521994134897 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8799595627 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8181818182 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77272727273 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209445460277 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741516580485 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513247551022 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151872137222 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584681665338 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.