Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
Historically, discoveries and exploration have been intellectual nourishment feeding humans' sense of curiosity since time immemorial. Humans' curious nature has been conducive to monumental milestones and breakthroughs in manifold scientific fields some of which may not have relevance to people's lives. Various points of view which are germane to the matter being discussed bring us to the moot question as to whether the government should allocate a vast sum of money to space exploration. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that although space exploration plays a consequential role in any given society, it is better to spend a substantial amount of money on other areas like education. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, it is the incumbent upon the government to dedicate a hoard of money for exploration in any realm. But some of which may not be beneficial for the whole population. Generally phrased, the government should bend over backward to provide support and incentive in the society and help people make a progress day in day out. AS a palpable example, the government should assign a hefty budget to improve education owing to the fact that not only can the society flourish and thrive but also can gain a conspicuous success in the long run. Indeed, not until education gets improved, can the society progress. To elucidate more on this issue, spend money on space might be a waste of money and time because not too many people might be able to take advantage of it. So, the government should try to take basic needs into consideration.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance on this subject is that the government can improve the public transportation system. If we take a minute to ponder over it, vast majorities of people are now suffering from traffic congestion, carbon dioxide emitted to the atmosphere, air pollution and so forth. It is necessarily needed to address these problems vigorously and successfully instead of spending money on space exploration. For instance, with a highly developed public transportation system not only can people lead a healthy life but also can travel to any far place with a small amount of money because it is the most cost effective way of accessing all places people need to go. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that the government should make efforts to enhance living standards when it comes to budget allocation.
However, every coin has two sides. The startling fact which flabbergasted and bewildered me is that all people think the space investigation is totally a waste of time and money. For example, our natural resources here on earth are terminating at a very swift pace. So, if the government does not find second sources, we will soon run into a huge problem. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal perspective.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 405, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...discussed bring us to the moot question as to whether the government should allocate a vast s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, second, so, as to, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 8.0752688172 396% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2611.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 523.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99235181644 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90548191893 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543021032505 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 836.1 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.822277907 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.52173913 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7391304348 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.60869565217 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169640781921 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442865603134 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459981262219 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827286889183 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453952031024 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.