Many people want to be a leader. Being a leader can bring a strong sense of self-achievement to us. Good leaders can also earn a lot of money. Many people believed that Leadership came naturally. It is impossible to learn to become a leader. I did not agree with that.
Firstly, being a leader requires experience. The experience is where we learned. We need to work hard in the team and learn how a team operate and what should be paid attention to within a big project and so on. No boss will feel comfortable if he assign a leader who did not have any experience in the group. Lack of experience will be a big problem. I did a case study before. It is a software team. Its leader did not have any experience. He did not know how much time they needed to finish the software. He estimated the time without any spare time, due to his lack of experience, which meant that they cannot make any mistakes. Otherwise, they did not have any time to fix that. The plan satisfied the customer, because according to the plan, it cost less time than he expected. However, after they worked on that, they found it impossible to finish the project within that time period, because they kept making mistakes. In order to finish that within the time period, they chose to ignore the mistakes they made, which cause disaster in the end. The software cannot work at all. If a experienced programer became a leader, he will assign some time for checking mistakes according to his past experience.
Besides experience, the leader should learn how to communicate with each other in the team. A team without any communication cannot be treated as a team. Nobody can be a good communicater without practicing that. My dad is a leader in many projects. He said when he was young, he was bad-templed and did not know how to communicate with each other. He screwed up some projects, because of this. He was critisized by his boss. Then he calmed himself down and observed what his leader would do to communicate. He learned a lot and finally he became a leader in the group. Communication skills required should be learnt.
In conclusion, I think one can learn to be a leader and learning is necessary, due to a good leader needs experience and good communication skills.
.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'assigns'.
Suggestion: assigns
...on. No boss will feel comfortable if he assign a leader who did not have any experienc...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1090, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nd. The software cannot work at all. If a experienced programer became a leader, ...
^
Line 3, column 1195, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
... for checking mistakes according to his past experience. Besides experience, the leader sho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ewed up some projects, because of this. He was critisized by his boss. Then he cal...
^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...perience and good communication skills. .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59653465347 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69897664451 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465346534653 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0739959458 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 56.2727272727 100.406767564 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.2424242424 20.6045352989 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.57575757576 5.45110844103 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 17.0 4.88709677419 348% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152520610491 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488265186728 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04497806227 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130749706904 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537628034613 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.4 11.7677419355 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.51 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.