Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Modern life, the foundation of people's happiness, has been valued and even triggers heated discussion over whether life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when people's grandparents were children. The previous life, in many people's views, is much better than today's life. Contrary to these people's opinion is my perspective that modern life is superior, due to the contributions to education and technology.
What must be prioritized is that life today, rather than past life, is beneficial to youngsters, by improving access to education and providing a well-rounded education. To begin with, only by experiencing life today, can students acquire a wider range of knowledge. In detail, by searching on the internet, students are much easier to access a large amount of expertise such as science, arts, and history, which can help them learn better; on the contrary, under no circumstances can past children access so much knowledge. Moreover, never can we ignore the significance of life today for offering a comprehensive education, which can be favorable to students. To explain it further, nowadays, not only are students able to learn traditional classes like physics, but also they can reap more novel knowledge like computer science; in contrast, children in the past could not access this new expertise.
What is equally worth discussing is that youngsters living today, instead of living in the past, can experience considerable original convenient technologies, by using search engines and social media tools. First, the more technology develops, the more young people can promote their study efficiency by using search engines. To be specific, when I want to solve some difficult problems, I can search google to get the answer, which can save me a lot of time compared to asking professors, and so I can spend the time saved doing other homework; however, in the past, children could only inquire about their teachers, and teachers were not always replying on time, which would cost children lots of time. Furthermore, never can we ignore the importance of social media tools in youngsters' life. Specifically, by using social media tools, I can connect with my families every day, even when I am away from my home, and I can share my daily life with my friends by sending my pictures to social media networks like Facebook; on the other hand, there was no chance for past children to communicate with their friends and families so conveniently.
Education, the foundation of children's success, can be boosted if they experience life today. Technology, the bedrock of modern life, can facilitate youngsters' life by inventing useful tools. In conclusion, only when children live today can they enjoy an easier and more comfortable life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ter than todays life. Contrary to these peoples opinion is my perspective that modern l...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... and history, which can help them learn better; on the contrary, under no circumstance...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2324.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19910514541 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83964270816 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525727069351 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 718.2 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 16.0 4.94265232975 324% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.2686410754 48.9658058833 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.25 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9375 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215118108061 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901523007756 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664265141466 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160739629735 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517599874531 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.