Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples
With no doubt, humakind instinctively seek to have affection for others. Philantropic causes, always were important for all people around the world, as today. Admittedly, I believe that presently, due to the epoch-making invention of the internet and better welfare that majority of residents in society have, people have more entuthiasim to help and donate for who need more assisstant.
To begin with, through the internet, we can be aware of varoius happening around the world. Nowadays, people gain information about many catastrophic events, such as earquicks more easily than the past. In this way, they will be encourage to help other people who need their attention. Moreover, numerous private and non-private foundations have been created that promot residents of society to contribute to their humanitarian missions. Thans to these efforts, people get more awarness and become excited to help others. As an illustration, my father has established a foundation which their focus is on the poor children who lives in slams. They advert their activities through socaial media and they have been successful in grabing people's attention to come and assisst for providing better life situation for those kids. They have accumulated a varitey of cloths for deprived families.
What's more, these days people chiefly can provide their families a life with an acceptable caliber for living needs. In fact, we can observe throghout society that today, families can afford to have great living condition, in camparison to the past, that amenities were rare and people hardly ever became satisfied by their needs. But now, kids, for example, normally, have what they want, as cloths, toys and so forth. In this case, people feel no more needs and they will be willing to help others by donating their useless cloths, for example.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that these days, people are more eager to assist other people. The advent of the internet and various foundation are very effective to encouarge people to help. Also, owing to better living circumstances that most of the families have, they have more willing to donate their useless cloths, for instance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 239, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: helping
...st. In this way, they will be encourage to help other people who need their attention. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ritey of cloths for deprived families. Whats more, these days people chiefly can pro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22988505747 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63719219363 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563218390805 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0734786195 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.111111111 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305223279461 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112104167084 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646124221954 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210892409725 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318698140468 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.