Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, a prime and fundamental controversy on the issue whether numoures or a single type of news resources can be helpful for an induvidual. some people would claim that one news agency is able to give them details of the events all atound the world. However, as far as I am concerned, I agree that different kinds and resources of the media is more convenient for two following reasons.
The first and foremost reason that I prefer to illustrate is the differences between news reporters and their views af a same subject. A relevant example can shed light on this assertion. 3 years ago, when I was living abroad as a student, a disaster happened in my homland in which I wasn't able to get access to a suitable news reporter due to gaining information about the condition. Moreover, there was a singular tv channel on my country that ignored all the matters related to the earthquick. Consequently, I started a tweeter account and got informed by some local reporters. Thus, aferomentioned tv cahnnel started to speak about the earthquick lately but not compeletly as I read about on the tweeter.
Another reason that should be taken into account is that one source of information can affect heavily on what we think and what we choose. For instance, according to a recent research study at George Washington University, democracy in a totaliter government has a different definition of other places. On the other hand, the people who are living in a society with just one source of information do not have a premium amount of knowlege. Furthermore, a popular method of management among dictator leaders around the world is an unusual decrease of the information.
To sum up, I firmly believe in various models and sources of information for two main reason. first, differneces between interpretations of the reporters is an usual happening. what is more, s single source of information can have unsuitable impacts on the mind of the audiences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...urces can be helpful for an induvidual. some people would claim that one news agency...
^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...aster happened in my homland in which I wasnt able to get access to a suitable news r...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...ces of information for two main reason. first, differneces between interpretations of...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...een interpretations of the reporters is an usual happening. what is more, s single...
^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...of the reporters is an usual happening. what is more, s single source of information...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for instance, to sum up, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92145015106 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95568348112 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598187311178 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.65542304 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8125 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140138735309 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397410977738 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294864327627 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771171546167 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144454353906 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.