Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? “People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.”

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? “People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.”

Although in some people’s opinion, traveling in their own countries has more advantages in comparison with traveling to foreign countries, I believe that we can benefit more from taking a trip abroad, based on some reasons that will be discussed in the following.
First and foremost, by traveling to foreign countries people can get familiar with various sorts of culture. I think that it is very important to see the world and different kinds of culture in order to open our minds to diverse ways for living. Furthermore, it would help us to recognize and learn more about their religions, beliefs and opinions which somehow show us how much variety of cultures are available in the universe. Therefore, we can gain some positive issues by searching about them.
Another equally significant argument is by taking a trip abroad we can observe diverse styles of architecture. Besides that, we can get to know some more monuments and historical buildings which can increase our knowledge about their country’s history too. Despite the fact that there are different kinds of architecture in people’s own community, visiting other ones would widen our views. In addition, we are able to experience being in famous historical buildings that are in other countries. Furthermore, seeing them can inspire us and remind some old stories about them.
For my last reason that is worth mentioning here, by traveling to foreign nations we can discover a lot about ourselves and we can learn more in compare to having a trip in our own country. We would obtain new and unique experiences which we would not encounter in our country. since by staying in foreign countries we need to live even for a short time, therefore we have to challenge more to speak, interpret and get to know the new society. it also would expand our knowledge and perspective.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Although in some people's opinion, ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at will be discussed in the following. First and foremost, by traveling to fore...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sitive issues by searching about them. Another equally significant argument is ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd remind some old stories about them. For my last reason that is worth mention...
^^^^
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
... we would not encounter in our country. since by staying in foreign countries we need...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 448, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...erpret and get to know the new society. it also would expand our knowledge and per...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, i think, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 309.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01294498382 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80542021615 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540453074434 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5078593442 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.642857143 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214468568443 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741947100254 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106928549972 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171803257709 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133507834744 0.0645574589148 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.