Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the enhancement of technology and personal computers, computer games have emerged in our lives, which have made vital impacts on our children's lives. Therefore, an important question has come to mind about the advantages of computer games for our children. I disagree with the statement that considers computer games a waste of time thoroughly. I will present my notions in the following essay by details.
In the beginning, nowadays, computer games are very popular among kids, out of which some companies make an industry. Still, the main question remains. are computer games a waste of time? I confront with this concept due to some major effect which they have on children's mind. current games have become challenging and hard in favor of their designers and developers. Hence, they challenge the kids' brains to solve different problems, which present in the game. Furthermore, some multi-player games make children collaborating to face their components, which can be other players or some artificial intelligent agents. These benefits can only achieve by computer games which prepare children for the arduous life they will confront.
Secondly and finally, there is some significant investment in researches for computer games in international universities that includes games' artificial intelligence and serious games. It can be another reason for comprehending that games are not harmful and time-wasting but in contrast, beneficial. currently, some researchers work on computer games to solve some problems; for instance, they have studied some ai problems in the simulation environment of computer games for using them in the future in the real world. The other research on which researchers spend their time is the term serious games. serious games are games that are not for entertainment, and they are for education and rehabilitation. To take an example, some developers and researchers develop several games for people who are disabled like amputees. On the other hand, some other developers design and develop games for children to learn their schools' lessons efficiently.
As concluded above, computer games are not a waste of time, and they don't make our children furious and angry. However, they are extremely helpful in preparing our kids for the future by teaching them different kinds of stuff like collaborating and better thinking. Moreover, there are some researches in computer games for solving ai problems and helping disables to have a better life; also, make learning for school kids more straightforward.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Are
...stry. Still, the main question remains. are computer games a waste of time? I confr...
^^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Current
...fect which they have on childrens mind. current games have become challenging and hard ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 302, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Currently
...me-wasting but in contrast, beneficial. currently, some researchers work on computer game...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 606, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Serious
...d their time is the term serious games. serious games are games that are not for entert...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 70, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...games are not a waste of time, and they dont make our children furious and angry. Ho...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for instance, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44472361809 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90099070614 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9823656908 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68181818182 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196689019784 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838774393676 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782914421201 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14252388888 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403445494745 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.