Since the dawn of civilization, human beings have been competing to gain much more knowledge and experience that helps them to establish their existence and become aware of their surrounding ambiance. Adolescents get knowledge from a variety of distinguished sources such as college, career, club activities, etc. It is opined by some that youngsters can get much more benefits from their academic studies than other sources while this essay is trying to refute this notion. Throughout the following paragraphs, among the most predominant reasons in support of this contention heightening self-confidence and preparation for the future job will be meticulously scrutinized to advocate this standpoint that students can get as many benefits from an organization as their academic studies.
To commence with, participating in extracurricular activities prepares students for their future careers. It seems that it would be a chance for the young to build their skillsets ranging from testing a real-job situation to heighten their social communication skills. Not only do Students experience circumstances that help them to recognize their weaknesses, but also adolescents learn various useful software related to their majors. Besides these benefits, it boosts their social communication activities through teamwork projects. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above. When I was a sophomore student, I hated my own major and didn’t have any inclination and perspective about that. By the beginning of the third year, a close friend of mine invited me to a club that not only did it aid me to encounter a turning point that improved my grades, skills, and viewpoints, but also it acted as a motivation to be prospered in future life.
Furthermore, organization and club activities are counted as the circumference to students probe their interests and Capabilities that consequently, youngsters can height their self-confidence. To more clarify the condition, I mention the outcome of one survey conducted s in AUT School to probe the role of these clubs on students. About 80 cases, consist of both sex equally, were minutely examined during their academic spans. Over 80% of those who take part in extracurricular programs have more confidence in their job interviews and they readily could get involved in their desire occupations after their college. Therefore, it is obvious that the more you participate in, the more you seize confidence and advantageous.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that students can reap benefits from organizations through their educational eras and also, I do recommend juveniles to participate more in these types of plans.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... you seize confidence and advantageous. To recapitulate, I pen down saying that ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rticipate more in these types of plans.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, therefore, third, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2275.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40380047506 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1733984525 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581947743468 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7074783192 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.823529412 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7647058824 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241225627786 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078173377355 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676489454872 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16089631603 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546373300709 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... you seize confidence and advantageous. To recapitulate, I pen down saying that ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rticipate more in these types of plans.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, therefore, third, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2275.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40380047506 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1733984525 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581947743468 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7074783192 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.823529412 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7647058824 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241225627786 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078173377355 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676489454872 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16089631603 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546373300709 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.