Our education is one of the most important part of our lifes. It usually determines our future job and our position in the society that we live in. Some people think in order to improve the quality of teachers performances, they should be paid according to how much their students learn. Others disagree. I concur with the second group. In my view, this won't affect the performance of the teachers in a good way and in some situations it is unfair.
First, it is not easy and almost imposiable to know how much students learn from their teachers. The only way to evaluate the knowledge of students, is by taking exams. And, in my view, the grades that a student gets from a exam is affected by many factors, and it does not only depend on the quality of their teacher. To illustrate this point, I want to compare two of the schools that I have studied in. In my highschool, the teachers were very good. The knew a lot about the subjects that they presented. But, since they used to take hard exams, ususlly the average of the scores that the student got, was low. So, even though the teachers were great, because of their hard exams, the grades were low. Now, if someone takes the grades as something to measure the quality of teachers, the good teachers that I had in high school would be rated as bad teachers. On the other hand, when I was studing mechanical engineering in Tehran University, I think the teacher were not as good as my highschool teachers, but since the exams were rather easy, the avarage was very high. So, as you can see, it is not easy to evaluate teachers, because the only way to evaluate them is based on the grades their students get, which depends on many factors other than quality of the teachers.
Second, better students don't nesseserily have good teachers. For example, I had this friend named Koosha, and because of he was poor he went to a low rated school. But since he was a very smart and and self dependent, he was better than me even though I had better teachers. So, if someone rates our teachers based on our knowledge, his teachers would be rated as better teachers. But I know it is not true, and the problem was me, not my teachers.
In sum, it is not acurate to evaluate a teacher based on the amoung of knowledge his or her students have. It will decrease the quality of exams.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... easy and almost imposiable to know how much students learn from their teachers. The...
^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ew, the grades that a student gets from a exam is affected by many factors, and i...
^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...he teachers. Second, better students dont nesseserily have good teachers. For exa...
^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because he' instead.
Suggestion: because he
...le, I had this friend named Koosha, and because of he was poor he went to a low rated school....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...d school. But since he was a very smart and and self dependent, he was better than me e...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'for example', 'i think', 'in my view', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.19341563786 0.229887763892 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.158436213992 0.158761421928 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.082304526749 0.0866891130778 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0493827160494 0.046263068375 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.100823045267 0.0685040099705 147% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.125514403292 0.118717715034 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0246913580247 0.0351676179071 70% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.38607460895 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0246913580247 0.0309702414327 80% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0905349794239 0.0887237588012 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0102880658436 0.0209618222197 49% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0102880658436 0.0139019557991 74% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2331.0 2387.08602151 98% => OK
No of words: 428.0 408.028673835 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44626168224 5.86048508987 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.292056074766 0.338922669872 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.207943925234 0.251872472559 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.130841121495 0.174417080927 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0771028037383 0.112833075102 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38607460895 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453271028037 0.524397521467 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.3654237774 59.2087087015 83% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6684587814 116% => OK
Sentence length: 17.8333333333 20.5533526081 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4200192471 48.84282405 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.125 120.699889404 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 20.5533526081 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.375 0.644075263715 58% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 38.6277258567 45.7405998639 84% => OK
Elegance: 1.11333333333 1.45489161554 77% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262823083968 0.300154397459 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.127940600011 0.103427244359 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0921606388397 0.0752933317313 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.498655602984 0.497263757937 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.157929017909 0.151897553556 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103936130954 0.114077575197 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739025969969 0.0781384742642 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.318458230571 0.336927656856 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.149536891966 0.067059652881 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170506868202 0.210909579961 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556785375202 0.0618886996521 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.86379928315 233% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 2.4623655914 284% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.