Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Over the past three decades, the remarkable alteration has been made in our understanding about the importance of teachers in society. There is long-running debate about the notion of whether teachers' value has been changed or not. While some people hold the opinion that temporary teachers receive less respect compared to the past, others believe their value has not changed with the passing of time. I, personally, concur with the former group because of two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following essay.
To begin with, with the advent of the Internet students find what they want in the net so they do not consider their teachers as intelligent individuals, and no more hold them in high regard. No longer are teachers seen as the sole source of information and data since all people can train like them just by watching free trial courses, which are abundant in the net. On the other hand, in the past, people did not access to such information and thought teachers are special individuals with an endless knowledge about everything. The more extend knowledge a person had, the more respect he or she received from the public, so people honored them more than today. My personal experience can bring this notion home. My grandfather was a teacher in local school. I remember that most of his students sent gift for him every week to show their respect. I am a teacher now in a high school and conversely, in my class most of students are engaged with their laptops or phones and even do not listen to me.
The second ground to be mentioned is that people do not respect the teacher since they see them as a poor people who are not smart enough to earn a good living. According to current reports, up to 90% of teachers live in abject poverty and suffer from a wide variety of mental and physical illness. In addition, most of them live in poor sanitary condition. All of these have ruined their reputation as a smart healthy people in the public view. As an illustration, consider a teacher who always wears old-fashioned clothes owing to his financial status. Therefore, he seems like a low level person in eyes of not only their students but also society as a whole. If he had fashionable clothes with a lavish lifestyle, people would respect him more than now since the society is going toward materialism.
To wrap up, with all aforementioned reasons taken into account, I do believe that nowadays teachers receive much less respect from people. Not only do they not seem as smart individuals thanks to the advent of the Internet, but also they seem as poor low level people in the public's eye.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: ''.
...rtance of teachers in society. There is long-running debate about the notion of whether teac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 914, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the students') or simply say ''most students''.
Suggestion: most of the students; most students
...high school and conversely, in my class most of students are engaged with their laptops or phone...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, second, so, therefore, while, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71304347826 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54498283258 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523913043478 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2999524541 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.238095238 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9047619048 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204299890963 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582376203072 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435988267479 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131614995589 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021169730303 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.