Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, people have encountered changes in various aspects of society, such as education. Also, there is a remarkable trend in the teachers' status. One of the most challenging topics on which there is no consensus among people is about educators' position in society. Opinions are divided into whether teachers are of great importance these days, or they were valued noticeably in the past. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that people respect educators more appropriately in comparison to the past. To support this, there are several reasons, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following essay.
First and foremost, in retrospect, educating was not prevalent, and was not the main precipitant for thriving. As a result, most of the families did not pay painstaking attention either to the educational system or to the teachers; therefore, teachers' tasks were not appreciated. As a case in point, my grandfather once told me that, when he was a child, practical jobs played a prominent role in determining one's status in society rather than academic qualification. In consequence, fathers made efforts to teach their children in use knowledge, like making bricks and clothing; however, in the modern era, learning is proved to develop one's intellectual ability and broaden the mind. So families become aware of the educational system's utilization and see teachers as immense assets of this system.
Another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that since enhancing academic quality has not fulfilled the ethical values of society; people consider schools a place where not only enhances students' expertise but also teaches them moral values, which leads to a prosperous society. Without a shadow of a doubt, with the growth of technology in conjunction with knowledge, people are of a similar status. So humanism is needed to be unique among individuals. In most of schools, educators teach moral values and psychological concepts besides the school's curriculum. Statistics reveal that new students are more prone to build a successful civilization. Therefore, families find teachers useful in conveying these values in a more organized way and behave them respectfully.
In summary of what has been illustrated and discussed in detail, it is a foregone conclusion that teachers have higher status these days. The fact that families pay more attention to educating, coupled with the importance of moral values being taught in schools, is the reason which strengthens my claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...lso, there is a remarkable trend in the teachers status. One of the most challenging top...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 409, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... played a prominent role in determining ones status in society rather than academic ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 730, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'systems'' or 'system's'?
Suggestion: systems'; system's
...amilies become aware of the educational systems utilization and see teachers as immense...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the schools') or simply say ''most schools''.
Suggestion: most of the schools; most schools
...eded to be unique among individuals. In most of schools, educators teach moral values and psych...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
... and psychological concepts besides the schools curriculum. Statistics reveal that new ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, in summary, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2736318408 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9431256454 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574626865672 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2272893294 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.578947368 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1578947368 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168538901896 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475086533406 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420608974177 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998492661101 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024013461545 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.