Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
While education is considered a paramount factor for the advancement of society, people have controversial approaches about educators' role in this modern era. Some considered that teachers do not cherish the respect which they deserve, others contemplate that they are as reputable as they were in the past because of the power and authority they hold. IF I were asked, I would definitely agree that teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. My firm belief on this is for a couple of reasons which I will explore in subsequent paragraphs.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my point of view is associated with the realization that along with the advent of technology, students have access to different ways of learning through the internet. Now they improve their intellectual capabilities by learning from a myriad of sources conversely it was not possible in the past when only teachers were the sole resource for their learning. Moreover, parents are more educated and knowledgeable, their involvement roles in school deprive the teachers of their prestigious rights to teach with their own will. My experience in this matter is influenced by my own compelling example. My nephew is in second grade and his visual memory is really strong. Last semester, his maths teacher complained about his weaknesses in maths; so instead of paying attention to the teacher's complaint, his parents suggested the teacher for using visual aids with him. No doubt, their advice was useful but the role of his teacher was suppressed by their action.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that educators have changed their teaching styles. In the past teachers are extremely strict and pupils were more disciplined and forced to listen to them. Now teachers changed their teaching style and are more friendly which is an obstacle in their motive to gain respect and value. Students took that freedom and independence in the wrong way. Drawing from my nephew's example, last week, he used profanity in school, and his teacher intentionally ignored him just in order to show her liberalism and adaptability to the modern style of teaching. As a result, he continued that behavior until his parents stopped him. I know that if I had done that in my high school, I would have kicked out of the classroom as a punishment.
In conclusion, educators do not get respect and value compared to the past not only because the teacher's role is superseded by multiple other resources, but also the tutoring style is molded to modern ways of teaching.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...paragraphs. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my point of view is associated with the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 826, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...; so instead of paying attention to the teachers complaint, his parents suggested the te...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...mpared to the past not only because the teachers role is superseded by multiple other re...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, if, moreover, really, second, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2172.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99310344828 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73706520952 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514942528736 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6426830392 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.315789474 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8947368421 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220405836141 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686935126548 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918636900465 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141631859949 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072696504035 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.