Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teachers are the backbone of a society which means they have the ability to bring out a change in people's life. In my opinion, teachers are not appreciated and valued in the present than they were previously. In the following essay I intend to put my arguments to support my view.
To begin with, the internet diminishes the worth of a teacher. The internet is great invention of this modern world that encompasses an encyclopedia in it. People from all around the globe can access any valuable information on the web. However, previously professors were the only reliable source for seeking knowledge which is why they were more respected. Nowadays, everyone on the internet can learn anything from anywhere in the world. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I had to prepare for the English language test so, my friend advise me to watched you tube videos. I practiced my test by watching these video. There was a website that also evaluated my language. As a result, I passed my exam with good grades. Thus, this example elucidates that teachers are no more valued as they were previously
In addition, nowadays teachers are not honest with their profession than they were in the past. Previously, professors were hardworking and fullfill their duty wholeheartedly as they wanted to brings good in a society. Nonetheless, today teachers are greedy and they feel their duty as burdensome. They mostly care about money therefore they do not put efforts in their work. To exemplify, my mother used to tell me when she was young the teachers were very strict and disciplined. They taught their students honestly and even after many years when their students met them they were respected. This is because these students were successful as result of their professors effort. However, my own cousin is a lecturer at a government university and he does not go to the university. Therefore, this example illustrates that teacher are not appreciated as they were before.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that teachers were more appreciated in the past than they were today. This is because, today teachers are not needed as internet provides them with every information, and because professors are not honest with their work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to prepare for the English language test so, my friend advise me to watched you t...
^^
Line 3, column 794, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple elucidates that teachers are no more valued as they were previously In add...
^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llfill their duty wholeheartedly as they wanted to brings good in a society. None...
^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'bring'.
Suggestion: bring
... duty wholeheartedly as they wanted to brings good in a society. Nonetheless, today t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...el their duty as burdensome. They mostly care about money therefore they do not p...
^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s because, today teachers are not needed as internet provides them with every inf...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, honestly, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00534759358 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75254620737 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524064171123 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3762601642 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5833333333 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299515166794 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868640635211 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942731515107 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199412471942 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359797272371 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.