Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Different people think diversely about the effect of technology on children and some of them believe that technology has made children less creative; however, I really disagree with their mentality and I undoubtedly think that technology leads children to become more creative. I believe that technology suggests new teaching ways and more children can use from didactic programs by new technologies; moreover, children can communicate with others by the internet and ask their questions from others.
First of all, I believe that technology proposes new excellent ways to teach children and they can learn lessons more and better; understanding the lessons is the base of creativity and children will create attractive and ingenious things. As a case in point, I remember that I had numerous problems with understanding math in elementary school but my little step-brother can understand math very better by using some computer didactic programs and I pretty sure that he will be more prosperous and creative than me in future. I think that most of teachers try to teach their students by new technologies, because they have understood that their children learn excellent by new technologies.
Furthermore, I believe that technology leads all children to access new sciences and more pleasant didactic programs and all governments know importance of e-learning. there are many villages in all countries that children cannot learn anything because there is no school in their countries. Nowadays, there are dozens TV channels which show free educational programs and can help children to learn new sciences; accessing to new sciences can increase children’s horizon and it leads them to create new things simpler.
Apart from using better didactic ways and accessing new sciences, I think that technology also leads to similarity in creativity. children can link some simple technologies and create a new complicated instrument; in addition, new technologies leads to more relationship with other people and children can share their ideas with others in all over the world by the internet and somebody may help them to solve their problems.
In conclusion, I earnestly emphasize that technology has made children more creative; although there is still a great deal of heated debate about this topic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...be more prosperous and creative than me in future. I think that most of teachers try to t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the teachers') or simply say ''most teachers''.
Suggestion: most of the teachers; most teachers
...reative than me in future. I think that most of teachers try to teach their students by new tech...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ernments know importance of e-learning. there are many villages in all countries that...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Children
...also leads to similarity in creativity. children can link some simple technologies and c...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, still, apart from, i think, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4226519337 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93155361425 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483425414365 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.1389575473 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.454545455 100.406767564 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.9090909091 20.6045352989 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6363636364 5.45110844103 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168424061049 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786282521552 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436270907478 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110620186405 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445642466888 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 11.7677419355 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 10.002688172 205% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.247311828 205% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.