Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

Nowadays, with the technological advances, the communication between the people are decreasing. Many people have watching TV for many hours, hence, they do not have time and cannot do others things, like for instance, stay among friends and family. I think that television has destroyed communication among friends and family, I think this way because a couple of reasons and I will explore in the following essay.

First of all, many people do not out from their houses because they always are watching some movies or series. For instance, I have several friends that stay a whole day in their houses watching television, and they solely just go out when extremely necessary. Watching TV too much can change the people’s behavior, and this can make them even more alone.

Second, even within our homes, many families do not communicate properly. For example, many parents after a tiring day, just want to watch something and rest, without interacting properly with their children. This lack of communication can harm the children’s development and behavior during their formation and education. Clearly, children are watching too much TV too, this can harm them because they stop to do other more important things, such as studying.

Finally concluding, I think that watching TV too much, can be harmful to communication between friends and familiars. In some way, the technological advances like Television improving our lives, however in some cases, this can be awful for all who watching a lot of TV and do not have time to spend among their friends and familiars.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are always
... not out from their houses because they always are watching some movies or series. For ins...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... important things, such as studying. Finally concluding, I think that watching TV to...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun TV seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of TVs'.
Suggestion: a lot of TVs
... this can be awful for all who watching a lot of TV and do not have time to spend among the...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, second, so, for example, for instance, i think, such as, first of all, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 258.0 407.700716846 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16279069767 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81672829641 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531007751938 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 618.680645161 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9474925721 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155922203392 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689713494199 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661875293401 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112925762289 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884905881189 0.0645574589148 137% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

More content wanted.

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.