Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
In any country, a high percentage of individuals work in factories and companies as a worker, and their attitudes play a significant role in the social, economic, and political situation of the countries. In this regard, having different tasks and a single task in the workspace are two of the crucial factors in which must evaluate in the work policies. In my opinion, having different tasks in the workspace is so more beneficial than a single-task. I will explain my viewpoint through two outstanding reasons.
First, by doing different tasks in the workspace, workers can show their novelty and innovation in their duties. In multi-tasks jobs, the worker is freer than people who work single-task about doing their duties, and they can evaluate their results in plenty of aspects. For instance, these kinds of workers have experienced many things during their working years, and they are able to detect most of the problems that others cannot easily find them. Therefore, these workers become skill-worker. As a result, they are more reliable than other workers. In contrast, single-skill workers only concentrate on one aspect of their job, and when they fall into a problem that they do not previously face, they cannot manage the situation, so they have to refer to skilled workers.
Second, working as a single-task worker in the workplace is fairly boring, and workers might lose their favorite in their jobs. Doing the same task not only in the workplace but also in any duty is so boring. In addition, doing one task will decrease workers efficiency in the workspace. Consequently, companies might fall in problems, and it causes reduce the profits of companies. By contrast, sometimes, single-task jobs might have positive results for workers. As a real story, in 1970, there was a power plant in China, and one of the workers who was working for this power plant, for escaping from a boring situation, he spent his time for learning English, and he was able to earn an educational grant for learning English in London. By spending valuable courses in London, he managed to promote from usual worker to foreign minister of China. However, these kinds of sample are very low, and maybe only few people can receive this kinds of achievements.
In conclusion, gaining expertise in the working field and avoiding typical boring duties are the most vital factors in which a person ought to be a multi-skill person in their job, without considering these approaches, we might lose quite a few opportunities in life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ich must evaluate in the work policies. In my opinion, having different tasks in t...
^^
Line 3, column 935, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
..., and maybe only few people can receive this kinds of achievements. In conclusion,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, as a result, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2107.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01666666667 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74599171913 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.339919958 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.894736842 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1052631579 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21052631579 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270658427164 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951551542222 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801834365991 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148826964527 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114099581795 0.0645574589148 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.