Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In this fast-paced world, available of jobs facilities a wide range of work for people to do leading to the flexible and permanent task in many particular job. This is suggest that whether worker will more please to have variety types of section to do in workday or only do one for all day long. I, as a fervent advocate of the different task statement, assure that it will bring to people more energy and benefit.

To begin with, alteration mission in a day provide a motivation for the worker to take their responsibilities. To be more accurate, repeating one kind of action in all day cause the negative effect in an individual since people already know the outcome of their work and have to stay for hours to do a familiar task leading to boring. On the other hand, with a variety task in a day, worker will able to improvise with a alternative mission, which required a lot of attention and knowledge to cope with each circumstance. Hence, workers feel more challenging in working and have to gain a thick knowledge resulting in exciting emotion when finishing a workday. For example, when I was a logistic in school camp event. In day one, my mission was to ensure all stuff of camper safely which means that I had to stay in one place to take care of good so I feel really exhausted. However, in the other day, my task had a little bit changing which I could teach the camper and running to set up a camp night, I became more powerful and energetic.

Furthermore, handling alternative number of task create honed a strong skill for worker lead to more potential opportunity. This is because of working in an abundant of task in a day form a resolving problem skill for worker as they have to operate many fields. Approaching flexible kind of task also make an individual become an extraordinary worker in a factor or company, when they can accumulate such a myriad lesson during working. Therefore, they will absolutely have higher ability to promote their state and their income based on the experience they got, which make them happy and give a meaningful in job.

In the end, sense of working will be convey to the worker when they access to the variable mission of jobs in a day.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'suggested'.
Suggestion: suggested
...nt task in many particular job. This is suggest that whether worker will more please to...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...day, worker will able to improvise with a alternative mission, which required a l...
^
Line 3, column 917, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...owever, in the other day, my task had a little bit changing which I could teach the camper...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, really, so, therefore, as to, for example, i feel, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58375634518 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64928910619 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502538071066 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.0873849048 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.4 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2666666667 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329741531904 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112481185122 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571553538129 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202793303453 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050040289104 0.0645574589148 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.