Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is indeed undeniable that jobs play a significant role in almost every aspect of our lives. Although doing similar tasks will be more easier for workers, doing many different types of tasks will make them more enjoyed and productive. People often divided by the idea either doing variety of tasks during a day will be more arduous or not. Regarding this controversial issue, I believe different tasks will help workers to be more flexible and their workdays will not be tiresome.
On this account, doing variety of tasks in a workday will help workers to change their monotonous working styles. Working on same tasks again and again will cause workers to be exhausted. If their jobs are different, they not only will enjoy working, but also they will have more efficiency. According to the psychological research conducted in the United States in 2014, the workers who do the same job everyday and their job do not have any creativity are more exposed to be depressed and suffer from psychological problems. This study indicated that doing different tasks will positively affect both the workers' moral and their lives.
Another significant reason which should be taken into consideration is that diversity in workers tasks will help them to gain information about them. They will learn how to manage different tasks and they will not have stress if they are asked to do them. Take my own experience as an example, I worked in the university's laboratory for months as operator. In the beginning I had much stress because I did not have any information about all of the equipment in there. I also did not know the names of those equipment. After working with all of them I learned how to use them and I became more confident. This demonstrates working on different tasks will help workers to achieve valuable skills.
In conclusion, I tend to go along with the idea that workers will be more satisfied if they do variety of tasks in a workday. No one can deny the fact that being efficient and flexible in doing all types of tasks in the workplace will cause satisfaction for both workers and employers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...s. Although doing similar tasks will be more easier for workers, doing many different types...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... will be more easier for workers, doing many different types of tasks will make them more enjo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 404, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...n 2014, the workers who do the same job everyday and their job do not have any creativit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...se I did not have any information about all of the equipment in there. I also did not know...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this equipment' or 'those equipments'?
Suggestion: this equipment; those equipments
...there. I also did not know the names of those equipment. After working with all of them I learn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81267217631 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62016347264 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482093663912 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9965177299 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0555555556 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38888888889 5.45110844103 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321368348888 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121972853592 0.076458572812 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876669536472 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23570572412 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308901101329 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.