Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
In the modern-day, job plays a prominent role in all societies. Owing to it is paramount importance, a large number of scientists have always been searching for ways to enhance job acquiescence. This issue of whether or not employees become satisfied when they do multiple tasks during a week or do similar duties has provoked controversy among human beings. I personally assert that perform a regular career brings happiness. In what follows, the most clear-cut reasons will be discussed.
The first argumentative factor to take into account is that workers have a lot of free time when they do a simple job. To shed more light on this matter, I should say in the most well-known companies all members have specific duties that they must do during the day. In this situation, after some months, they become a professional and expert person on the determined duties; hence, they can do their task time and energy effectively. Therefore, such employees have free time after they finish their duties, and they would be able to do some extra activities, such as reading books, studying a second language, and searching in their field of work for enhancing their performance. Moreover, not only do they tasks in the best ways but also they can improve their own skills. For example, consider a big tire company that contact with international ones. In this situation, when their employees have free time for studying English, they can connect to the foreign ones impressively and improve their technologies.
Another equally significant point is that people who do a routine job have less stress than others in their workplace. To elaborate on this point, most individuals become anxious when they face different tasks and duties suddenly. In this situation, they would not schedule their duties in the best ways; indeed, they must tolerate a lot of stress that has drawbacks on their bodies and minds. Most scientists believe that such people struggle with the arduous disease, such as heart attack and blood pressure. Additionally, some of these workers become a depression people, and they may resignation from their occupation. Nevertheless, if individuals have a simple and repetitious career, they would do their duties in the best ways without any stress or anxiety.
Taking all aforementioned reasons and examples into account, we may draw a conclusion that a simple and routine job has more advantages compared to a hard and multiple job. I believe that such jobs not only help to improve companies and employees situations but also help to reduce the amount of stress among workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s. Owing to it is paramount importance, a large number of scientists have always been searching f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...enhance job acquiescence. This issue of whether or not employees become satisfied when they do...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 709, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'task'
Suggestion: task
...performance. Moreover, not only do they tasks in the best ways but also they can impr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10772833724 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76251720304 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503512880562 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6830630794 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.05 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.35 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324519840778 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104326924792 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903949030776 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189285961033 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101573846894 0.0645574589148 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.