Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you

Courses, the founding stone of students' academic learning, have been valued and even trigger heated discussions. Some people argue that students should take courses with professors whose classes they have never taken before. Contrary to these people's views is my perspective that we should take courses taught by professors with whom we have already had other classes during our past years of study, which contributes to our learning efficiency and academic research.

What should be prioritized is that we should enroll in modules taught by familiar teachers. Compared with courses educated by strange professors, we can improve our learning productivity. After attending the professor's other courses, we will be familiar with his pedagogical tactics, such as his speaking speed and the time spent answering questions. By knowing the professor's teaching strategies, we can have better preparation for the courses. For example, if the professor speaks fast, making us hard to follow in the class, we can review the textbook and scrutinize the concepts beforehand, which can help mitigate the situation and facilitate us to master the subject. Therefore, our productivity may increase. On the contrary, if we take courses educated by professors we do not know, we may find it arduous to adapt to their teaching method. Under this scenario, our learning efficiency may deteriorate. For example, a professor who never explicates complex math equations may lead us to struggle in mathematical deduction if we have already gotten custom to other teachers who teach with details. Thus, taking modules from a different professor may be destructive.

What should be equally worth discussing is that learning with the professor we are already acquainted with is conducive to our research achievement. In the university, if we have a strong interest in a research topic conducted by a certain professor, we can take the initiative to join the group. This motivation is based on the fact that one has already had a deep understanding of a professor's research interest and also knows about his personality. To a certain extent, only by taking courses taught by a certain professor can we have these insights. Thus, taking courses instructed by familiar professors could provide us with information relating to the professor’s disposition and research thesis. Take me as an example. Professor Zeng was the teacher of Introduction to Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. I took the first course when I was a freshman, and then I continued to take the second course when I was a sophomore. After continuously taking these two courses, I was intrigued by the magic of AI and knew Prof. Zeng is a prominent researcher. Then I joined his lab, and finally, I had a publication in a well-known AI journal.

Admittedly, it seems conducive to join modules taught by different professors because it can help us enlarge our social circles. It is because, by taking courses from various teachers, we can encounter more excellent educators, enabling us to expand our personal network. However, sometimes it is onerous to accomplish it. Professors may be in charge of a large class, and numerous students would ask them questions, occupying their time. Under these circumstances, we can hardly have chances to communicate with them, not to mention get acquainted with them.

To conclude, only by taking courses conducted by familiar professors can we be more efficient and have excellent research opportunities.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 9.8082437276 245% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2950.0 1977.66487455 149% => OK
No of words: 558.0 407.700716846 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28673835125 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86024933743 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01276814261 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 905.4 618.680645161 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.884575266 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260771537593 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777011218328 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622511583202 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17643970629 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567467009146 0.0645574589148 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 86.8835125448 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.