By and large, the vocation that one chooses has a huge influence on his future. But on what base the decision of choosing a carrier should be taken has been a place of argument for many years among scholars. There are a plethora of people who are in the conviction that youngsters should follow their parent's carrier choices and choose similarly, while others take a radically different point of view and disagree. To the extent that my personal perspective is concerned I accord with the latter group. Among countless reasons which give adherence to my opinion, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones in the subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, youngsters should follow their passion and their instincts rather than stepping in the same path as their parents in the matter of vocation since their talents may differ from those of their parent. Stifling the talents and natural abilities of youngsters by forcing them to put foot in the same career path of their parents can have serious adverse effects on youngster's self-esteem and self-image since they might not be able to fill into their parents shoe or simply lack the necessary abilities that are indispensable for the job.
For example, my uncle exercised his power as a parent to force his son into becoming a doctor like himself. Never did it cross his mind that his son didn't had what it takes to be a good doctor. Depressed from his awful grades at medical school, he attempted suicide the second year of his medical school. After his unsuccessful attempt his father forced him to talk to a therapist and after those sessions with his therapist he decided place a more liberal confidence on himself and follow his heart and as a matter of fact he turned out to be a very competent musician.
Secondly, should youngsters choose a different vacation than their parents, they may be able benefit their families in different ways. Choosing different jobs than their parents necessitates different problems and different people to cope with, which can be beneficial for the family in long run. For instance my brother choose to be an artist which is not closely related to my father's job whom is an engineer. From the moment that my brother had been involved with art, we have been able to be more familiar with different art forms and a lot of artists.
In short all the aforementioned reasons and examples leads to the conclusion that should youngsters choose their career different than their parents, they can provide an opportunity for their talents to flourish and in the same breath help family members by showing them different perspectives.
- It is better to take a secure job with a low pay than to take a job with a high pay but is easy to lose 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree? People gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...ever did it cross his mind that his son didnt had what it takes to be a good doctor. ...
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
...oungsters choose their career different than their parents, they can provide an oppo...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, while, for example, for instance, in short, as a matter of fact, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2173.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90519187359 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60379026005 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512415349887 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.6525776164 48.9658058833 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.8125 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6875 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141058796565 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503784750799 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558918124071 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084785658003 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393154104317 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.