Education of very young children in recent years has been extended in many countries while this question has been raised how important this training is. Some says it is the most educational program for a system and some other believe it is not vital as university learning. I agree with this statement says government should spend money more on education of five to ten years old kids than universities and I explain my opinion in following reasons.
First of all, researches have shown learning ability in childhood is strongly effective in comparison with any period of life. It means children particularly five to ten years old learn easily scientific subjects because of their brain readiness and freshness while in older ages a human being's skill to catch lessons would be decreased. The other issue causes the more efficiency in children for learning is their simple life and hence their concentration in contradiction with university students that have many complex problems like relationship, economical concerns and the other distraction factors. For example a project on developed countries indicates investing ten dollars in learning system for kids has reflected 7 dollars in developing process of a nation while it is just 5 dollars in case of university educating.
Secondly, teaching kids in interval makes them familiar with importance of science and they will be interested in knowledge in primary years of living. It means they follow the high level training by themselves and it declines the cost of education in future for government and also length of learning would be longer from five to twenty years old. For instance introducing astronomy subject to a five years old boy which has a potential talent in this field causes he try to learn it from this age whereas he normally studies this course in university or high school from sixteen years old.
Finally, governments can know and select effectively the talented persons with educating them from childhood age. When science has been taught in elementary school then teachers could distinguish better which subject is matched with abilities of a boy or girl and also parents can plan for future of their children properly because they understand very soon before it gets late that what career is fitted to their talents. For example in my country we have national organization with an integrated exam which take IQ test and the other scientific subjects to determine and select the talented individuals for every specific field.
In conclusion, there are many comments that it is not recommended to put stress on young age children and some countries do not invest on education of five years kids but in overall evaluation many researchers suggest this is indispensable to train our people from many young age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...d freshness while in older ages a human beings skill to catch lessons would be decreas...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
...otential talent in this field causes he try to learn it from this age whereas he no...
^^^
Line 9, column 55, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended putting'.
Suggestion: recommended putting
... there are many comments that it is not recommended to put stress on young age children and some c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2341.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12253829322 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75096915722 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531728665208 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.4828049241 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.214285714 100.406767564 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6428571429 20.6045352989 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7857142857 5.45110844103 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316904680979 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109230805087 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848198481807 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174264321426 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08468064132 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 11.7677419355 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.