In the world of modern science and technology, there are several sources of information from all over the world. We can extract exact facts and figures with comparative study of divergent news resources. There are different ambiguous matters associated with some writings. For reliable and accurate news, we have to be informative enough to read more. Therefore, I completely advocate that a person must get information from many different news resources inorder to be well informed.
Firstly, a person can learn better if he can utilize the available resources of information. Consulting different news resources helps us improve our reading habit. This will increase our ability to analyze the information. There are numerous newspapers, online news portal and several news channels which are covering political events, accidents, meetings, wars, business, education and so on. But providing genuine information is not their sole objective, thus, we have to be more advisable and cognitive to grasp any information from such sources. Because, most of the resources are business oriented due to which they exaggerate negligible things into whole gigantic issues.
Secondly, with the advent of technology, everything is a click away. However, it is our decision to grab an opportunity to be informative and knowledgeable about the changes taking places in every nooks and corners of own country and other countries too. There has to be comparative study of resources. This will help us to compete in different real life situations. In the same way, we will be able to surge our intelligence level regarding information.
Thirdly, being informative will help us remove ambiguities publicised by unwanted news portal. We can share our knowledge to group of nearer people. One relevant information can be breezed everywhere in such a way that false information will be boycotted by the mass. Right to information is our human right. Hence, we have to be aware about the reliability and accuracy of the news we are engaging with. This will absolutely help to shore-up a well informative population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 426, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...that a person must get information from many different news resources inorder to be well infor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...nformed. Firstly, a person can learn better if he can utilize the available resourc...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rasp any information from such sources. Because, most of the resources are business ori...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, well, as to, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33734939759 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97067977195 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58734939759 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7778159295 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5454545455 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0909090909 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13636363636 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249721688813 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766227052514 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737578203691 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166965612089 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791793308757 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.1 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.