Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time.
The modern life is a place of competition for the doing and presentation of different projects. Perhaps the most significant milestone of these presentations is the quality them. While some people are in the conviction that the handling one task in each attempt is a sound idea; others, on the other hand, believe otherwise. I absolutely agree with the first group and will cogently explicate my stance on this issue in what follows.
The first reason which shapes my outlook is that the focusing and handling a sole issue is convenient. In fact, each project can be considered as a duty for the person acceptance it. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of each mission is the best presentation. If an individual does not provide the adequate function in the particular task, his effort will be abortive and meaningless. By considering that, the acceptance of enormous responsibilities at the same time can lead to the decrement of the person's function. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the subject is my own instance. When I was a university student, for one semester I picked two practical projects, architecture design and project management, it was a very arduous task to concentrate on both duties at the same time. As a result, I gained lower mark in both of them. However, I picked each of them in one semester; I would be able to pass them with the best record.
The second factor which advocates my idea is that the focusing in one issue means fewer mistakes. Indeed, as there is a sufficient span of time for the presentation, the feasibility of the failure is small. Therefore, the opportunity of the best outcome is more than the handling the various tasks in the identical period. According to the noteworthy, intelligence survey conducted in my country, by the decrement of the span required for a particular task into a half, the possibility of error is doubled. In this condition, the different duties at the same time lead to a short period of their preparation. This study lucidly explains that the sufficient time for the function is the crucial element for the success.
Nevertheless, some people may assume that by doing two or more jobs at the same time, they can be fast. Moreover, today's hectic lifestyle demands this rapid pace. However, they overlook the importance of the result. As mentioned above, if the works' outcomes possess the lots errors, the fast speed is useless; since people should redo the previous tasks to modify their failures. Consequently, they repeat the same time, and it is more time consuming than doing a sole job. This condition thoroughly demonstrates the speed and validity of doing one task.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons can lead us to the logical result that it is better to finish one task and then initiate the other one. The focusing in one issue, the task will be easy to handle, it will end to fewer mistakes; moreover, it will be done in the shorter period. All in all, I firmly recommend the finishing one job and then the starting another task to be sure of its outcome and success.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, while, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2557.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 531.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81544256121 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80934724306 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495291902072 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 813.6 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 13.0 3.08781362007 421% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0837319894 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3214285714 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9642857143 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176180534995 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425718320712 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530698482791 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883429472207 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396503594968 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 86.8835125448 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.