Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

It is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time.

The modern life is a place of competition for the doing and presentation of different projects. Perhaps the most significant milestone of these presentations is the quality them. While some people are in the conviction that the handling one task in each attempt is a sound idea; others, on the other hand, believe otherwise. I absolutely agree with the first group and will cogently explicate my stance on this issue in what follows.

The first reason which shapes my outlook is that the focusing and handling a sole issue is convenient. In fact, each project can be considered as a duty for the person acceptance it. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of each mission is the best presentation. If an individual does not provide the adequate function in the particular task, his effort will be abortive and meaningless. By considering that, the acceptance of enormous responsibilities at the same time can lead to the decrement of the person's function. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the subject is my own instance. When I was a university student, for one semester I picked two practical projects, architecture design and project management, it was a very arduous task to concentrate on both duties at the same time. As a result, I gained lower mark in both of them. However, I picked each of them in one semester; I would be able to pass them with the best record.

The second factor which advocates my idea is that the focusing in one issue means fewer mistakes. Indeed, as there is a sufficient span of time for the presentation, the feasibility of the failure is small. Therefore, the opportunity of the best outcome is more than the handling the various tasks in the identical period. According to the noteworthy, intelligence survey conducted in my country, by the decrement of the span required for a particular task into a half, the possibility of error is doubled. In this condition, the different duties at the same time lead to a short period of their preparation. This study lucidly explains that the sufficient time for the function is the crucial element for the success.

Nevertheless, some people may assume that by doing two or more jobs at the same time, they can be fast. Moreover, today's hectic lifestyle demands this rapid pace. However, they overlook the importance of the result. As mentioned above, if the works' outcomes possess the lots errors, the fast speed is useless; since people should redo the previous tasks to modify their failures. Consequently, they repeat the same time, and it is more time consuming than doing a sole job. This condition thoroughly demonstrates the speed and validity of doing one task.

To wrap it up, all aforementioned reasons can lead us to the logical result that it is better to finish one task and then initiate the other one. The focusing in one issue, the task will be easy to handle, it will end to fewer mistakes; moreover, it will be done in the shorter period. All in all, I firmly recommend the finishing one job and then the starting another task to be sure of its outcome and success.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'while', 'in fact', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.215488215488 0.229887763892 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.132996632997 0.158761421928 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0959595959596 0.0866891130778 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0387205387205 0.046263068375 84% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0521885521886 0.0685040099705 76% => OK
Prepositions: 0.117845117845 0.118717715034 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0319865319865 0.0351676179071 91% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.80934724306 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0218855218855 0.0309702414327 71% => OK
Particles: 0.0016835016835 0.00188951952338 89% => OK
Determiners: 0.151515151515 0.0887237588012 171% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0218855218855 0.0209618222197 104% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00673400673401 0.0139019557991 48% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3084.0 2387.08602151 129% => OK
No of words: 531.0 408.028673835 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80790960452 5.86048508987 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.48200974243 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.312617702448 0.338922669872 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.250470809793 0.251872472559 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.184557438795 0.174417080927 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.128060263653 0.112833075102 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80934724306 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495291902072 0.524397521467 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 59.1197391795 59.2087087015 100% => OK
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6684587814 135% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9642857143 20.5533526081 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1202639717 48.84282405 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.142857143 120.699889404 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9642857143 20.5533526081 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.644075263715 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 44.0113666936 45.7405998639 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.63157894737 1.45489161554 112% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380403255221 0.300154397459 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.1019311231 0.103427244359 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0617011462714 0.0752933317313 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.546714357124 0.497263757937 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.147025346824 0.151897553556 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146374198561 0.114077575197 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630140841243 0.0781384742642 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.517326467016 0.336927656856 154% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.10579481838 0.067059652881 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265082976224 0.210909579961 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303759386817 0.0618886996521 49% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8870967742 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.91756272401 183% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 2.75985663082 290% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 13.6433691756 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.