Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
We all know that practice make man perfect. For this prefection to be attained, the practice should be consistant. Of course, recreation is needed in between the work but if there is continuation then we can achieve our goals much faster. Yes, I say I would not agree to the point that it is more enjoyable to have a job and work for long hours and for just three days. Instead I feel that short working hours for five days would be more efficacious. I have several reasons to support my opinion. Among that I would be exemplifying few of them in the next paragraphs.
First, there should be a continuation in the work what we do. Consider our scientists. They not only work only for five days but the whole week to do the research and invent a new thing. Not only for people who do job, but also the students. If the students do not do a continuous study, they will loose the hang of the subject and have to start reading form the beginning. If there is continuous effort, one can reach the goal. Obviously, we would need some breaks with the continuous work, for that, having small pleasures in between would re-energizes us to proceed with the work.
Next, the advent of newer technologies helps us keep active and continue our work. An application has been developed that alerts us when we become indolent and reluctant. These applications are used by the IT sector. We all know that in the IT sector work load is more and in order is shine in this sector, we need to thrive maximum. For this working only three days with long hours will yield no progress. Because IT jobs are stressful and no one can work for long. Instead, with some breaks and small pleasures, one can feel relaxed and continue the work.
Finally, I always believe that one should always keep oneself busy. If there is five day work, then the person would be busy for maximum number of days in week. Engaging oneself would lead to more productivity. On the other hand, if there is three day work and take pleasure for the rest of the days, there are chances of one loosing the interest to come back.
In a nutshell, working for five days with shorter working hours are better than working for long for three days. In fact, working for five day with shorter hours are more enjoyable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...for long hours and for just three days. Instead I feel that short working hours for fiv...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...do not do a continuous study, they will loose the hang of the subject and have to sta...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...f the subject and have to start reading form the beginning. If there is continuous e...
^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...luctant. These applications are used by the IT sector. We all know that in the IT sect...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...d by the IT sector. We all know that in the IT sector work load is more and in order i...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 327, Rule ID: LOOSING_EFFORTRECORDSEASON[1]
Message: Did you mean 'losing the'?
Suggestion: losing the
...t of the days, there are chances of one loosing the interest to come back. In a nutshel...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, so, then, i feel, in fact, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5072815534 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38552970132 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470873786408 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 552.6 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6928757535 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.7777777778 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2592592593 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18518518519 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407104430375 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12125920034 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123305222022 0.0737576698707 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270679827776 0.150856017488 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834891689439 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 11.7677419355 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 58.1214874552 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.1575268817 55% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.29 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.