Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Friends are the important part of our lives and without them we cannot simply define our lives. Success and happiness in our lives are also due to their involvement in our lives. So, it is important to have a good relation with them. Some people think we should give more importance to make new friends rather than keeping up with the old friends, others disagree. In my opinion, it is more important to keep up with our old friends than to make a new friend because of following reasons.
Firstly, an old friend knows you better. They are habituated with our happiness and sufferings, so that they can show us a good direction in both trouble and enjoyment. A person without a friend often becomes alone in these extreme cases and derailed in his life. But with a close and good old friend, we can share both pros and cons of our lives to them and it will certainly help to sustain in a good track. For example; I was broken down due to my breakup with my girlfriend this past year and one of my old friend has helped me to maintain my composure. At that time if I had gone to seek some favors from any new friend, then I think they will make a fun of my condition. I leaned that a true old friend is much more helpful than any new friend in such circumstances. So, it is crucial to maintain a good relationship with our friends so that we can get benefit from them in these extreme cases.
Secondly, friends are pivotal to function our lives properly. Becoming social and friendly is the most important in the world and without which it is difficult to progress. However, making a few friend and trusting them is always a risky thing because we cannot simply know about their intention and attitude in a short time of influence. For example; if we allow our any new friends in our business and trust them blindly, it is probable that they might deceive us and we cannot do anything just repenting on it. So to avoid such risk, it is better to give focus and priority to our true old friends. They can make our lives happy and enjoyable. Similarly we should be careful to make a new friends and to rely upon them.
Thirdly, if we just go on making new friends and ignoring our old friends, will they continue relation with us ? In some days, these new friends will turn into old friends and when we ignore them at that time of their need, will this define our friendship to them? If we just go on making new friends without giving any attention to our old friends, simply we can be called as "betrayer" and any of friend won't keep up with us. Eventually, this habit will harm us. We might be alone in our lives in our old days when we need them more.
To sum up, we should give more importance to our old friends. We can make new friends but replacing old with new is not a good virtue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun friend seems to be countable; consider using: 'few friends'.
Suggestion: few friends
...ifficult to progress. However, making a few friend and trusting them is always a risky thi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 648, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...can make our lives happy and enjoyable. Similarly we should be careful to make a new frie...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, third, thirdly, for example, i think, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 92.0 43.0788530466 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2284.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 524.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35877862595 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7844588288 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41763288215 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.414122137405 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 689.4 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.316681935 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5925925926 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4074074074 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253401389644 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101289478138 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811517618377 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198116697516 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505297944525 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 58.1214874552 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.63 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.