Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Leaders nowadays play a profound influence in modern era due to the growth of population. A leader should have several qualities to be influential leader such as being a good speaker, the ability to solve problems in difficult situation and so on. Therefore, when it comes to the question whether leadership comes naturally, people adopt spread spectrum of attitudes toward this question depending on their characters and educational backgrounds. On the one hand, there are people who adhere to the belief that some qualities are innate and people cannot learn them such as leadership; on the other hand, others believe that every one can be an influential leader in different area of expert. As far as I am personally concerned, the latter carries further weight since not only can people develop their skills by practicing but also can people be an influential leader if they decide to work in the area of their expert.
Skills can be improved depending on how much a person practice on them. In fact, although people may be good at some skills and bad in others, they are able to develop them, if they intend to improve them. In other words, skills are learnable and they will be enhanced as long as a person wants to develop them in order to meet their needs. For instance, one of the most important qualities of an influential leader is being a good speaker in public which can be improved if people attempt to exercise in front of mirror for them selves or for small group of people at first. Subsequently, provided people want to be a good leader, they should be confident and work on their skills.
People can be an influential leader, if they manipulate their skills and experts appropriately. In fact, nowadyas, people typically get different degrees through which they develop specific skills after several years of study and research. Therefore, they can be good leader in their feild of area. For instance, an artitecture can be a leader of all construction companies or tremendous projects, a pilot can be a leader of other pilots or so forth. To this end, they should learn how to use their expert and put them into practice and build up their confidence. Consequently, poeple can be a good leader in their lives even if they do not have some natural abilities.
To wrap it up, leadership is learnable since not only can people develop their skills and learn new skills but also can they be an influential leader if they use their developed skills alongside their experts. So I can be a leader, if I can just trust on my talents and skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
... and so on. Therefore, when it comes to the question whether leadership comes naturally, people adop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: THEM_SELVES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'themselves'?
Suggestion: themselves
...empt to exercise in front of mirror for them selves or for small group of people at first. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in fact, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76404494382 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65560175463 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444943820225 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1313168611 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.777777778 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7222222222 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147119750482 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650678329048 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326389395505 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110077258483 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330547794807 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.