Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.
Throughout the history parents have played an effective role on their children's lives. Although with the appearance of the industrial revolution parents had to spend more time on working, the impact of the efficient relationship between each parent and the kid still remains the same. Nowadays people are doubtful about the involvement of parents in their children's education, some men think this involvement has been improved but some others do not think so. In my opinion parents have participated in theirs kids’ education and improvement more than before and I will demonstrate two of my reasons in the following paragraphs.
The first reason which comes to my mind is that in the third millennium, social health and the beneficial facilities recommend families to have fewer children than before. As the result of this suggestion, each parent has more time to participate in his/her child's educational program; Moreover, parents can take care of the learning process of their children more. For making this reason more understandable, I remember once my mother told me her father didn't know about the educational level which she had studied that year, also my mother claimed her father did not have enough time to even talk to all the children, because he had seven kids and that made the family crowded.
The second reason which I want to discuss about is that according to the advent of technology, chasing the student's educational schedules does not take as much as time like before. In recent years the count of schools which sends the report of the students’ efficiency in the classroom or in the other activities at school, are increasing rapidly. As a result of this technological improvement in schools, parents can be aware of their children's behavior at school even at their working time, also each parent might reply the feedback of the kid to the teacher to guide him for realizing the whole aspect of the student's characteristic. As an example, one of my university classmates had a seven-year old son. Each school days, the son's teacher had sent some pictures of the students’ activity for my classmate. Leading to the taken pictures, my friend asked her son about the result of each activities which he had taken part in and if he had been weakened in some of them, she tried to help him for a better performance.
To wrap up, not having more than one or two kids, parents will focus on each child more carefully and following their educational schedules would be easier. Also, lead to the useful technological devices such tablets and smart phones, parents can get the report of theirs children's proficiency every time they want, rather than asking it from the teachers personally. In addition, these years some courses of the student's program has useful assignments for strengthening the connection between schools and students with their parents by requesting them to perform some group activities such as organizing a food exhibition or selling handmade stuffs at school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ember once my mother told me her father didnt know about the educational level which ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 737, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sons'' or 'son's'?
Suggestion: sons'; son's
...ven-year old son. Each school days, the sons teacher had sent some pictures of the s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, then, third, in addition, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2516.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05220883534 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81033548111 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516064257028 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 767.7 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.2240515221 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.25 100.406767564 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.125 20.6045352989 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278404053793 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106921642638 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822161419301 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205294657642 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994228052047 0.0645574589148 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 11.7677419355 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.