Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Regarding whether teachers should talk about their social or political views with students during classes, different people hold divergent opinions. Some would maintain the standpoint that they should not do this because sometime the negative attitudes towards the society could harm students. I partly agree with their notions. However, from my point of view, I disagree with this statement.
First, other than teaching knowledge to students, from my perspective, the most crucial responsibility for teachers is to teach the correct values to students. As an old saying goes in China, teacher is the person who teach valuable knowledge and noble values to others. Thus it is attached great importance for teachers to transform their own correct views about the society and politics to the students in the classroom. Consider my own experience which can shed some light on this issue. I still remember every class of Chinese in middle school, our teacher Mr. Li would talk about some his own social and political views about the current situation. He encouraged us to think about these kind of issues and reflect with our own perspective. And it was exactly his optimistic opinion and innovative views about our society impress me a lot and make me to become a person who is willing to contemplate and put out my own opinions.
Second, education will make the whole country prosperous only in the way teaching the students to tell the difference of correct and wrong, kind and evil. Therefore this ability of identification should be fostered by teachers from a young age of students. By transforming teacher's own social and political views to students, they are more aware of the border of bad and good things. Also, they know the direction in which they need to work hard and contribute themselves to the whole country. As a result, the patriotic education and flourish development of the country will be settled with ease. According to a survey conducted by Wuhan University in 2018 about the patriotic education among students in China, about 1/3 of students claim that they are deeply influence by their teachers' social and political views to become a patriot. Furthermore, the survey also shows the social or political opinions of teachers can encourage students to work hard in their academics.
Admittedly, it is undeniable that someone would argue the negative social or political views proposed by teachers could have negative effects on students. However, the regulation on teachers' education and training, plus students' ability to tell the black or white, makes this points unconvincing.
To sum up, whereas there is an argument for banning for teachers to make their social or political perspectives known to students, namely the negative attitudes could harm students, the crucial responsibility for teachers to teach students the right values, coupled with improving the educational levels of country, makes a strong case for my disagreement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e knowledge and noble values to others. Thus it is attached great importance for tea...
^^^^
Line 5, column 687, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...uation. He encouraged us to think about these kind of issues and reflect with our own pers...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ce of correct and wrong, kind and evil. Therefore this ability of identification should b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...on students. However, the regulation on teachers education and training, plus students a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 221, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...n teachers education and training, plus students ability to tell the black or white, mak...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, regarding, second, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, kind of, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2500.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23012552301 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7597401478 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481171548117 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 752.4 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4903361343 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.047619048 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7619047619 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2380952381 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290363200127 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939451594158 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649958290208 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180296853998 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571562408136 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.