TPO-41 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

There are two different school of thoughts where one agrees with the perspective that teachers are not valued same as before while other school of thought disagrees with aforementioned question. Personally i have proclivity towards thought that value of teachers is decreasing over time because of two reasons. Firstly nowadays teaching of gaining knowledge has many ways another one is reduction in number of experienced teachers.

In ancient era teachers were only source of knowledge and one has to live with teacher and earn knowledge. As time passed the education system changed, many sources of knowledge were made available through internet and different online educational courses were introduced. today's generation thinks that they do not need a teacher because they access every information through internet. Before few centuries for little information all were depend on teacher and because of this they were respected lot. New generation has tendency that if I am benefited then only I will give respect otherwise i do not need anything. Students are not attaining classes so they dont even know who is their teacher.

Secondly number of experienced and brilliant teacher with ability to control students are really scarce. Teenage students always listen to their elderly teachers and make fun of younger teacher. Due to lack of experience teachers fail to maintain integrity of teachers image. This happened with when I started teaching, missed one point and few students noticed they started to laugh at me. Following year I studied lot and learned lot about handling them and earned my respect back. While some areas time has no effect of respect of teachers because of high morality of students and teachers.

After this holistic analysis, it is evident that the points in favor of the first school overpowers the points in favor of second with its logic,cogency and rationale.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Todays
...ne educational courses were introduced. todays generation thinks that they do not need...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ew centuries for little information all were depend on teacher and because of this t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...nturies for little information all were depend on teacher and because of this they wer...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...then only I will give respect otherwise i do not need anything. Students are not ...
^
Line 3, column 661, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...dents are not attaining classes so they dont even know who is their teacher. Seco...
^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , cogency
...points in favor of second with its logic,cogency and rationale.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, while, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25986842105 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66694776299 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585526315789 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9923755745 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9375 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161785330435 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551617363547 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356906859672 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885569652846 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409717280462 0.0645574589148 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.