Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Many individuals of the contemporary era state that children have become less creative because of technology, and that they should be prohibited to use tech. I completely disagree with this statement.
First and foremost, modern advances in technology and science have helped people become significantly more intellectual. People who use technology on a daily basis have an easier access to the internet. This is a crucial factor in their development. The world wide web has an unfathomable amount of information that can be utilized by anybody. This aspect can help children and adolescents attain more info and learn about a myriad of subjects more easily. This facet instead of being detrimental towards children's mental health, can actually aid them and broaden their understanding of the world. This can make them more innovative. For instance, I have become a lot more experimental due to technology.
Secondly, technology can guarantee children to become more tolerable and accepting in the future. Many older people cause social disrupt with their rasict, sexist and religionist ideologies and opinions. Recent studies have proven that these problems can be overcome if youngsters learn more about other's thoughts and start respecting them. Bill Gates, world-renowned philanthropist and co-founder of Microsoft, once said, "Teenagers and children need to use and comprehend technologies, because they are an irreplaceable part of their lives." All of these facts can entice kids to become more inventive and caring in the future.
Lastly, accessing tech daily can cause certain changes in children's minds that would help them be more imaginative. For example, many modern authors get their inspiration from real life events, which they read about online using their phones and other devices. John Green, a famous author of the 21st century, has implied that he wrote his bestseller books using indispensable facts he acquired from the internet.
In conclusion, technology doesn't make kids less productive or creative. It helps them develop and learn about their surroundings, makes them more modernized and a lot more abstract thinkers.
- The following statement appeared in a consumer magazine:A fear of crime has led many homeowners to purchase monitored burglar alarmsystems, but these people are wasting their money. The primary benefit of anyburglar alarm system is one of deterrence, and 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 80
- Unknown is necessary 33
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...oaden their understanding of the world. This can make them more innovative. For inst...
Line 8, column 27, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...he internet. In conclusion, technology doesnt make kids less productive or creative....
Line 8, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
... conclusion, technology doesnt make kids less productive or creative. It helps th...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 333.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5015015015 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9767379927 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591591591592 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5953709333 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4210526316 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5263157895 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0862459655631 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351901845998 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445290910485 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678875493844 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575210194264 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.