Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
no, I disagree with this statement because I class="think">think, improving the quality of education class="is">is unrelated to the salary of the university class="professor">professor. although, the salary of the university class="professor">professor class="must">must be fair. I class="think">think to improve the quality of education, class="we">we class="must">must improve the methods class="that">that use for education and using new way for teaching science or engineering and etc. class="we">we class="must">must use class="some">some ways for increasing mutation in students. class="also">also class="it">it class="will">will be class="better">better class="if">if universities increase the science journey because in this way class="student">student class="will">will class="have">have fun and they class="learn">learn their lessons very well and class="will">will enjoy from class="it">it, class="also">also class="if">if class="some">some lessons class="teach">teach by using live example or the students class="have">have to class="do">do class="some">some thing in order to class="understand">understand class="some">some class="case">case of lessons class="that">that class="will">will be class="so">so much class="better">better for their learning. I class="think">think, the professors should want students being active in their class and class="have">have challenge with their class="professor">professor in class="some">some class="case">case, I am sure in this way, classes class="will">will never be boring and students class="will">will class="understand">understand very class="better">better. I class="have">have seen in class="some">some poor country, there class="is">is not enough struments for teaching and class="if">if teacher or class="professor">professor class="do">do not use class="some">some way for getting class class="better">better, class="that">that class="will">will be class="so">so boring and students class="will">will not interest to lessons or they class="will">will become to hopeless and they class="will">will be frustrated. I am hopeful for having class="better">better life and class="better">better education for every one in the world
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: No
no, I disagree with this statement because...
^^
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...ass='professor'>professor. although, the salary of the university class=&ap...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 596, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...way for teaching science or engineering and etc. class='we'>we class='...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 740, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
...ys for increasing mutation in students. class='also'>also class='it...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 798, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'classes'?
Suggestion: classes
...pos;>also class='it'>it class='will'>will be class=&apos...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 1454, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
...o'>do class='some'>some thing in order to class='understand&apos...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2532, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: class
...apos;some'>some way for getting class class='better'>better, class=&ap...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2854, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...'will'>will be frustrated. I am hopeful for having class='bette...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 52.1666666667 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2755.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 241.0 407.700716846 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 11.4315352697 4.8611393121 235% => Less chars per word wanted.
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 11.8613484009 2.67179642975 444% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 116.0 212.727598566 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48132780083 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.9 1.51630824373 191% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 293.679858647 48.9658058833 600% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 344.375 100.406767564 343% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 30.125 20.6045352989 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.45110844103 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0228695661582 0.236089414692 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345995547046 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310978128212 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0228695661582 0.150856017488 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 47.5 11.7677419355 404% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -68.95 58.1214874552 -119% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 19.3 6.10430107527 316% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 30.3 10.1575268817 298% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 49.61 10.9000537634 455% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 50.0 10.247311828 488% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.