Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Without a shadow of doubt, the advent of different technological communication tools and applications plays a prominent role in every individual life. Nowadays, all people including students try to benefit these tools in order to communicate with their friends for different purposes. In this regard, some people are inclined toward this opinion that using such tools can make it easier for students to work on a project whereas others hold exactly the opposite perspective and believe that gathering around each other and have a face to face contact is more effective. From my vantage point, the latter’s advantages carry more weight. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two noticeable reasons.
First, one should take into account the fact that using such a communication tool like e-mail by students can waste their time. It is crystal clear that if students want to have contact with each other via e-mail, they need to pass and get many emails in order to solve a specific problem or having an argument about doing a part of a project. Therefore, it may take long hours to reach a good solution. On the other side, students can set an appointment and get together and discuss their opinions and solutions. In this way, they can reach a unit solution sooner. To shed light on this issue, when I was a master student, three of my friends and I had to work as a group on a project. We set Saturdays as our meeting session for discussing our progress. One of my friends was a member of another group, which decided to have a connection through e-mail. After one month, my friend said they could not even start the first phase of their project, While, our group was in the last phase, because they put a huge amount of their time on passing e-mails.
Another equally noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that some projects have practical parts, which disable students to have connections just by e-mail. It is no secret that a wide spectrum of projects contains practical works such as installing specific software and doing and interpreting some parts of the project using the software. Hence, it is crucial for students to gather around each other and investigate different parts of a project, those need practical work. As an example to illustrate, one of my friends was working within a group on a project. The project needed to be installed two software that students could interpret their experiments’ results using them. My friend had major problems in installing one of the software, but, they connected each other through e-mail and he could not understand his team members’ explanations. Finally, they failed to implement the project on due time. Had they have a face to face connection, they could have solved my friend’s problem and delivered the project on time.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that having direct contact in a group of students, not only help to save their time but also benefit them to solve their problems much sooner. Although there are many benefits in using e-mail to have connections with other team members, it has some critical disadvantages that cannot be neglected, which may conducive to failing a project.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 933, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[4]
Message: Possible agreement error – use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ement the project on due time. Had they have a face to face connection, they could h...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2708.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 548.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94160583942 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83832613839 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76181353784 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496350364964 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 824.4 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1115874609 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.833333333 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208061847259 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662584444513 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456691551494 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128657513431 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499831111649 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.