Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Communication contains a variety of ways that by advent and development the technology, it goes toward the subjective communication. In this regard, there has been a vibrant debates among the academicians whether using social media or email is better or having relationship in person. There are a myriad ideas about this issue. However, from my perspective, it is more valuable and convenient to talk in person instead of using email or other ways.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that it provides the opportunity for discussing about a specific topic and get the result or convey our thought fur better than emailing. To exemplify more this issue, if the person argues surrounding a subject in person, it might associated with a new result or solution to improve the productivity. As a matter of fact, in this method, two brains callobrate to take a logical decision or present a suggestion.

Another equally noteworthy point in corroborating this issue, it creates the situation to respond more quickly in comparison to the e-mail. Owing to the fact that not only do all persons not check their emails every day but also it might last for a few days. Consequently, imagine the individual has an important and immediate task so hel she must await for long time and it sometimes led to miss the chance or important event in their works. I cite my experience to shed light to this context. While we have a worthy project and we need to the urgent decision of the manager but due to the fact that he was on journey and did not check his email the company meets the huge disadvantage.

Last but not least, it is an indisputable fact that the inadvertently faults during sending message occasionally causes that people send the message to other people and do not receive any responds. In conclusion, their project may not go on very well. As a case in point, when I was a student in the university, I sent the message about my thesis to one of my persons by mistake. After one month, my supervisor asked me why you do not continue your thesis and there is no progressive in it, I understand I made a disaster by sending wrongly message.

In brief, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that communicating in person although companied with some disadvantageous, all in all its merits conspicuously outweigh its drawbacks. Besides, the individuals can assure about their relationship and decisions for improvement of the works.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'idea'?
Suggestion: idea
...ationship in person. There are a myriad ideas about this issue. However, from my pers...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: DT_RESPONDS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'response'?
Suggestion: response
... to other people and do not receive any responds. In conclusion, their project may not g...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, well, while, in brief, in conclusion, as a matter of fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2045.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85748218527 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97321333199 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572446555819 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7171541771 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.611111111 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3888888889 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174596492819 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464431322572 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265216704097 0.0737576698707 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883055639466 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136649721913 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.