Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Working on a project requires a lot of effort. Some people think that working together in a group is more practical and useful. In contrast, others feel that working separately is better because of the decision they make without negotiation with others. In my view, working in a group is far better and more effective. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

First of all, working in a group can be beneficial in sharing thoughts. In other words, if we are working on a project, it is better to get various ideas and beliefs to choose which one is suitable. On the other hand, working on a project individually can be harder to decide which topics and ideas are better to choose. Additionally, working with a group can help correct wrong ideas. My own experience demonstrates this issue. Last year, I was studying Electronics in college, and the professor divided the students into groups to work on a fire alarm project, which was our last task, so we started to share our thoughts and how we could get the best ideas to get full mark. I shared my steps with one of my mates, which was wrong, and he corrected it before we send it to evaluation. As a result, we could get full marks quickly by sharing and fixing some errors I did what we were working on. That why I feel groups are better for work.

Secondly, working in groups means less effort, and quicker to get the project done. If we have a few days before the assessment, then working in a group will be more suitable. Only by dividing the work on the group, each one works in a specific area, which will not be difficult. Compared with working alone, it will take much time to finish the task under time, and it will be way harder to complete the project. For example, about two years ago, I had been working in a group in our robotics class, which required the robot to walk in a straight line and not getting out of it. The problem was I had many reports which had to finish before the robotics project. So, my group and I worked on that project in a few days before the final deadline. It seemed impossible to get the project done, but we could handle it efficiently when we divided the tasks between us. Finally, we could finish the project before the deadline, and we received a good grade, which was more than we expected. As you can see, the group is way too sufficient than working individually.

In conclusion, group working is much better than individually working because of the variety of ideas we can learn and apply, and because of the time it takes to finish the project.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Working on a project requires a lot of e...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll explore in the following essay. First of all, working in a group can be ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I feel groups are better for work. Secondly, working in groups means less e...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ficient than working individually. In conclusion, group working is much bet...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, as to, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in my view, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47578947368 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44816489586 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450526315789 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5330385544 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.04 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.24 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230258760546 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081140382938 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330754573792 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163750592612 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220509493798 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.