Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The best way of teaching students has being discussed between teachers and school administrations. Once we are leaving in a very competitive world, schools have the desire that students leave schools with as much knowledge as they can. Personally, I am a big fan of "team working" and I am totally in agreement with students`participation in projects. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, work with different people might increase students capacity on troubleshooting and boost their ability to learn. During the brainstorms students are allow to discuss about their different points of view and also learn from each other experiences. An example of mine might help to illustrate that. When I was in high school, my biology teacher divided our class into 4 groups and we were requested to find a solution for a genetic issue. I was too convinced that my idea was the best but I was wrong. When my peers gave their views, I realized that some concepts of genetic I had no knowledge. As a consequence, my team found a better way to resolve the assignment.
Secondly, teamwork may teach us how to be more cooperative and improve work efficiency. It means that working in a group is essential nowadays if you want to succeed in your daily tasks and also in your job. For instance, during my University life, I had the opportunity to attend an internship in a big oil company. All the interns were asked to find a better solution for the issue present in a gas pipe and the requirements were that we should work alone and we should give the solution to our supervisor after 1 week. As a result, none of the interns showed a solution. To continue this project, we were requested to work together and the consequence of our efforts was the delivery of results in just 3 days. Work in a team, might help to prepare young people for this valuable skill they will need later in life.
To sum it up, as aforementioned, work teams are essential during students life. Not only because it might provide an efficient way to find solutions for problems but it also allow students to learn how to be more cooperative.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'allowed'.
Suggestion: allowed
...rn. During the brainstorms students are allow to discuss about their different points...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'discussing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: discussing
...ring the brainstorms students are allow to discuss about their different points of view an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 175, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'allows'?
Suggestion: allows
...find solutions for problems but it also allow students to learn how to be more cooper...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, i feel, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73821989529 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01286497136 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552356020942 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0662919645 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23608222271 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634739233898 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429578375586 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140736114949 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184283708692 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.