Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people enjoy life more than old people do.
Enjoyable life is different from one person to another person and from one culture to another culture. Some people believe young person can enjoy more than old person. I believe that old people have their own enjoyable staffs to do.
I think there are direct relation between biological change and the way people can enjoy their life. In fact, the definition of being enjoy is distinct between different people and cultures. As a person get from youth to old, they experience new roles and being successful in their rule can be enjoyable to them. Subsequently, old people obtain new roles such being ground father or ground mother, retired, and having more friends which can contribute them to be happy.
In addition, having enjoyable life dependent on the perspective you are setting eyes on that. In fact, we can be happy just if we the way we can enjoy. For instance, if the one who is retired, think regards retirement as being old and disability it can make his life so horrible and boring and lose his confidence but if he observe his retirement from distinct perspective such having more friends, having descendent, being successful and so on it can make more enjoyable moment for him.
To summarize, having enjoyable life change relate proportional to what stage person is, early, middle or elder age. Their perspective can determine the amount of joyous and happy in their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'observes'.
Suggestion: observes
...oring and lose his confidence but if he observe his retirement from distinct perspectiv...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for instance, i think, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 52.1666666667 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 1977.66487455 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 236.0 407.700716846 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92796610169 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53862364793 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 212.727598566 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512711864407 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 618.680645161 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.692001336 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9166666667 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245488933752 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115360139243 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860424504789 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156695944999 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845566936105 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 86.8835125448 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.