do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
young persons who are under 12 years old should have different teachers like 12-18 years old students.
Although some people adamantly claim that young persons who are under 12 years old should have different teachers in their everyday school, others take an opposite point of view. Personally, I am of the opinion that having one teacher for all the lessons is better for these students. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, interacting with different teachers seems to be difficult for these kids. Each teacher has a unique personality and teaching method so it would be difficult for the kids to adopt themselves with these diverse approaches. Conversely, a teacher who teaches all the lessons could discover the sutdents’ talents better since he/she is aware of all the lessons the students study. For example, I can remember when I was in the primary school, a pilot plan implemented on the students who were in the third year. In this plan, different teachers teaches different lessons for their student. Fortunately, this plan stopped early since all the teachers witnessed that they saw a rapid drop in students’ grades. When the researchers talked to the students, they asserted that the new situation was so unfamiliar for them and it was difficult to handle as well. So they publish their outcomes from this case study in educational journals. There were some other investigations about this issue several years later and they proved this consequences as well. Therefore, I think that this idea is generally true.
Second, lessons in the primary school aren’t hard enough to need several teachers. By the changes in modern educational system in the recent decades, most of the lessons which little kids learn in the primary school are mixed with playing and intertainment. Even in some schools, teachers don’t consider any real grade for the students and allow them to play more and develop their personality through playing with other kids. Considering all these conditions, it seems that playing with children doesn’t need several mentors. My sister’s experience could elucidate this argument. My sister is a teacher in a primary school that is so famous because of its modern equipments and new teaching method. My sister often talks about her tasks in the school which includes playing, playing, playing. I think that it would be so easy and it has no extra workload for a teacher to do this.
All in all, it would be better to have one teacher for the children in the primary school because not only the children could communicate better with the same teacher, but also the lessons in the primary school in so easy that one teacher could handle them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the third year. In this plan, different teachers teaches different lessons for t...
^^
Line 2, column 1046, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...sue several years later and they proved this consequences as well. Therefore, I thin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 720, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ern equipments and new teaching method. My sister often talks about her tasks in t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, second, so, therefore, third, well, for example, i feel, i think, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2213.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01814058957 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67939140888 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489795918367 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4192005259 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.590909091 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0454545455 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180604502481 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054658987856 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733681101847 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133616155831 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960979451672 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.