Employees who always follow their supervisor's instructions are more valuable to their companies than employees who try to find new or better ways?
At new Year remarks in 2018, domino pizza's CEO said, "All employees should be idea bankers." this led me to think what the qualification of workers is. In my opinion, more helpful staffs are the people who do not always obey supervisor's instructions, and the reasons follow.
Admittedly, having obedient workers that support their supervisors play a key role in working efficiently. In essence, most companies pursue greater efficiency which can increase productivity and sales. However, employees who stray from direct instructions of their supervisors enable their work to distract at some point. Specifically, if employees take their own initiative and come up with new ideas in addition to their supervisors, the team or the project can have many directions which are not expeditious. Leaders are the people who are qualified to have a key to make decisions by companies. With the bosses, employees can perform what their bosses tell them to do, not bring any ideas to the table which can interrupt their projects' goals.
Nevertheless, encouraging employees to have individual ideas is also a way that companies seek the best goal. If a company just hires a bunch of "yes men," the responsibility for coming up with a successful business plan all falls on the supervisor's shoulders. What if the supervisor has a really terrible plan that causes the company to lose investment? Employees who willingly give their constructive opinions are much more valuable in this case. By speaking up and not just following their bosses' lead, these workers help the company from losing many judgments such as money and company values. The shining example of this is domino pizza, one of the biggest pizza chain brand. In domino pizza, the workers can suggest their new recipes to be selected for pizza of this month. The company provides a great reward to the person who developed the new pizza. Among the selected pizzas for three months, all the workers try the samples of three pizzas of months, they rate what the best is to release. With the process, their new pizzas are always big issues to the public. This contributes to the employees to let them work freely and enthusiastically, also, speaking of the company, it allows gaining money and good brand awareness.
To summarize what I mentioned above, I think having workers who think individually is better than working with employees who only follow their supervisors' opinions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
At new Year remarks in 2018, domino pizz...
^^^^
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...CEO said, 'All employees should be idea bankers.' this led me to think wha...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tructions, and the reasons follow. Admittedly, having obedient workers that...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... interrupt their projects goals. Nevertheless, encouraging employees to h...
^^^^
Line 8, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...pany just hires a bunch of 'yes men,' the responsibility for coming up with ...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng money and good brand awareness. To summarize what I mentioned above, I t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, thus, as for, as to, i think, in addition, speaking of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1725 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83829944685 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5375 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0694511256 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.45 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414831473192 0.236089414692 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125496072714 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921818161644 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260503052911 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563359298462 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.